A former director of a firm that had a €300 million deficit prior to being wound up in 2014 has lost an appeal to overturn an order restricting his ability to act as a company director or secretary for a five-year period.
Cork solicitor Fergus Appelbe was one of three directors of Alvonway Investments Limited, whose loans were acquired by the National Asset Management Agency (Nama) in 2011. The company’s primary asset was Wilton Shopping Centre in Cork, which was purchased in 2004 for €124 million.
Alvonway, incorporated in January 2005, was among a number of companies owned and operated by Celtic Tiger property baron Joe O’Donovan, who consented to a 2020 restriction order in lieu of a disqualification.
In a judgment given by Ms Justice Mary Faherty on Tuesday, the Court of Appeal upheld the High Court’s October 2020 order against Mr Appelbe, restricting him from acting as a director or secretary of a company for five years unless the company meets particular requirements set out in the Companies Act 2014.
File being prepared for DPP over insider trading
Christmas tech for kids: great gift ideas with safety features for parental peace of mind
MenoPal app offers proactive support to women going through menopause
Ezviz RE4 Plus review: Efficient budget robot cleaner but can suffer from wanderlust under the wrong conditions
Mr Justice Michael Quinn said in July 2020 in the High Court that payments made to Mr O’Donovan and his accountants in August 2013 without Nama’s prior approval were effected by Mr O’Donovan without the knowledge of the other two directors.
The payments, totalling €450,000, made from the company’s current accounts appeared to be the principal impetus for the orders sought by liquidator Ken Fennell, Ms Justice Faherty noted.
‘Little knowledge’
A director since the firm’s inception, Mr Appelbe had argued before the High Court that he had “little knowledge” of what was happening in the company during August 2013 because he was excluded when Nama became involved.
Mr Justice Quinn said Mr Appelbe seemed to misunderstand the serious duties of a director and seemed to believe he could avoid a restriction order simply by showing he was unaware of the particular transactions.
He declined an application to place a director restriction on Brendan O’Brien, who was appointed a director of Alvonway in October 2010, when the firm was already heavily indebted to Anglo Irish Bank. Mr Justice Quinn found Mr O’Brien had acted honestly and responsibly in relation to the affairs of the company.
In his appeal, Mr Appelbe asserted that the judge erred in making the restriction order in the absence of the liquidator having made a case for him to answer. That absence, he submitted, explains the brevity of his submissions to the court in response to the liquidator’s application.
Ms Justice Faherty said the fact that from 2011 onwards Nama was in control and liaised only with Mr O’Donovan did not absolve Mr Appelbe from his director obligation to keep himself apprised of the company’s affairs. He cannot now assert “with any credibility” that he did not know or suspect the company was in serious financial difficulty from at least 2011 and that this should have led him to be more assiduous in his approach to his duties, she said.
There was, in essence, a “total failure” on his part to provide information from which the High Court judge could derive he had fully informed himself of the affairs to meet his director obligations, Ms Justice Faherty continued. In those circumstances, the High Court judge had no choice but to make the restriction order as there was no evidence upon which he could find Mr Appelbe acted responsibly at any time, she said.
Ms Justice Faherty noted that Mr Appelbe’s honesty was not at issue in the restriction application and that a finding of dishonesty was not made against him.
Ms Justice Caroline Costello and Mr Justice Robert Haughton indicated their agreement with the decision.
