A worker who was written up when he took ill after a warning about absenteeism has won over €1,400 – or three weeks’ pay – for a breach of rights under the Sick Leave Act.
The Workplace Relations Commission (WRC)’s ruling in the case is only the second time an employer has been found to have violated the law, which came into effect at the start of 2023 and is still being phased in.
The worker, who was earning €12.70 an hour as a customer service adviser at an unidentified service provider to the financial services sector, told the tribunal he was disciplined with a verbal warning in September, 2023 following “a number of unplanned absences” from work that year.
He said they were because either he or members of his family were unwell.
‘I am back in the workplace full-time and it is unbearable. Managers have become mistrustful’
‘Remarkable’ officer who was subject to court martial should be rehabilitated and promoted, says ombudsman
Gardaí search for potential information left behind by deceased Kyran Durnin murder suspect
Enoch Burke’s father Sean jailed for courtroom assault on garda
The worker said he became “very sick with flu-like symptoms” at work on October 12th, 2023 and went out sick for a day and a half, submitting a doctor’s note to his employer and availing of his statutory sick pay rights under the Act.
After this he was disciplined by his employer and received a written warning, which was upheld in an internal appeal.
The company’s position was that the worker had been absent six times in ten months, totalling 11.5 days, which it regarded as a “significantly high” level of absence and “beyond what is deemed as an acceptable level of attendance”.
It told the tribunal it was “entitled to discipline” the employee, adding that “bad timekeeping” and “unauthorised absence” were listed as misconduct in its disciplinary policies. The company said that it had at all times followed the fair procedures and the relevant statutory code, and denied any breach of the Sick Leave Act.
Quoting the legislation, the worker, who represented himself, argued that a person availing of the statutory scheme was entitled to “be treated as if he or she had not been so absent”. He also maintained he had been penalised for availing of his statutory sick leave “for exercising his rights under the Act” when his employer issued the warning.
The WRC fully anonymised its decision because it was interlinked with a parallel Industrial Relations Act complaint, which had to be heard behind closed doors, identifying the worker only as “Mr F” and the employer as a “service provider to financial services”.
Adjudicator Emer O’Shea awarded €1,428.75, three weeks’ pay, for the breach. It is only the second time a worker has won a claim under the new legislation.
- Sign up for push alerts and have the best news, analysis and comment delivered directly to your phone
- Join The Irish Times on WhatsApp and stay up to date
- Listen to our Inside Politics podcast for the best political chat and analysis
