A community group has lost a Supreme Court bid to have planning permission for certain flood relief works in Cork city overturned.
The Save Cork City Community Association CLG (SCCA). in a leapfrog appeal to the Supreme Court. wanted the decision by the High Court last year to refuse to strike down the planning permission for the works around the Morrison’s Island area reversed.
But in a unanimous decision, a five-judge Supreme Court dismissed the appeal. It now means the works around Morrison’s Island can proceed.
Giving judgment of the court, Mr Justice Seamus Woulfe said he agreed with the High Court that An Bord Pleanála has jurisdiction to conduct a screening for an environmental impact assessment (EIA) in an application made under a certain section of the Planning and Development Act 2000. He, therefore, dismissed the appeal.
Markets in Vienna or Christmas at The Shelbourne? 10 holiday escapes over the festive season
Ciara Mageean: ‘I just felt numb. It wasn’t even sadness, it was just emptiness’
Stealth sackings: why do employers fire staff for minor misdemeanours?
Carl and Gerty Cori: a Nobel Prizewinning husband and wife team
Mr Justice Peter Charleton, Ms Justice Iseult O’Malley, Mr Justice Gerard Hogan and Ms Justice Elizabeth Dunne all agreed.
The Supreme Court previously heard the relief works at Morrison’s Island are necessary and a senior planning inspector’s report had shown that 374 properties will benefit from it.
In June 2020, An Bord Pleanála granted permission for remedial works to the existing quay walls in Cork city and the construction of improvement works and flood defence works between Parliament Bridge and Parnell Bridge along Morrison’s Quay and Fr Matthew Quay, and a short section along Union Quay close to Trinity footbridge at Morrison’s Island.
The community group mounted a legal challenge in the High Court but Mr Justice Richard Humphreys found it had not made out grounds for an order quashing the permission granted to Cork City Council for the works. He also ruled that the group was not entitled to a stay on the works.
The group applied to the Supreme Court for a direct hearing of the appeal against the High Court’s decision.
The respondents in the case were An Bord Pleanala, the Minister for Housing, Local Government and Heritage and the Attorney General with Cork City Council a notice party to the proceedings.
The appeal centred on whether An Bord Pleanála had jurisdiction to carry out a screening for the purposes of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Direction under a section of the Planning and Development Act.
The group contended An Bord Pleanála can request additional information about the effects on the environment of the proposed development but has no jurisdiction to request the submission of an EIA report and no jurisdiction to carry out one. It also argued the High Court decision had profound implications for legal certainty in local authority development.