CIA 'destroyed' interrogation tapes

The CIA has been accused of showing an "utter disregard for the law" after it confirmed that it destroyed at least two video …

The CIA has been accused of showing an "utter disregard for the law" after it confirmed that it destroyed at least two video tapes showing the interrogation of terror suspects.

The destruction of these tapes suggests an utter disregard for the rule of law. It was plainly a deliberate attempt to destroy evidence that could have been used to hold CIA agents accountable for the torture of prisoners
ACLU National Security Project Director Jameel Jaffer
The CIA acknowledged making the tapes to document interrogations of terrorism suspects that used techniques critics have denounced as torture. Central Intelligence Agency Director Michael Hayden told employees in a letter that the videotapes were made in 2002 as part of a secret detention and interrogation program that began with the arrest of suspected al Qaeda lieutenant Abu Zubaydah.

The taping was discontinued later that year and the tapes were destroyed in 2005, Hayden said.

"The tapes posed a serious security risk. Were they ever to leak, they would permit identification of your CIA colleagues who had served in the program, exposing them and their families to retaliation from al Qaeda and its sympathizers," Hayden said in the letter.

READ MORE

He said he was discussing the program because of pending news reports on it. The New York Timespublished a story on the tapes on its Web site yesterday.

The disclosure follows a separate instance last month involving a belated CIA acknowledgment that it possessed interrogation tapes sought in the trial of accused September 11 conspirator Zacarias Moussaoui.

Democrats in both the Senate and House of Representatives called for congressional investigations.

Sen. John Rockefeller of West Virginia, Democratic chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said Congress did not learn about the tapes' destruction until November 2006 - two months after the full panel was briefed on the interrogation program.

The news also drew fire from the American Civil Liberties Union, which has mounted a legal effort to acquire Justice Department documents it believes authorized harsh interrogations.

"The destruction of these tapes suggests an utter disregard for the rule of law. It was plainly a deliberate attempt to destroy evidence that could have been used to hold CIA agents accountable for the torture of prisoners," ACLU National Security Project Director Jameel Jaffer said in a statement.

Jennifer Daskal, senior counsel with Human Rights Watch, said destroying the tapes was illegal. "Basically this is destruction of evidence," she said, calling Hayden's explanation that the tapes were destroyed to protect CIA identities "disingenuous."

The detention and interrogation program was confirmed by President George W. Bush in 2006. Under it, terrorism suspects have been subjected to harsh interrogation methods, including a form of simulated drowning known as waterboarding.

Many countries, US politicians and human rights groups have denounced waterboarding as torture. It is believed three "high-value" CIA detainees were subjected to waterboarding and that technique has not been used in the program since 2003.

CIA spokesman George Little declined to characterise details of the videotaped interrogations.

Hayden said in the letter that new techniques were needed to obtain information from Zubaydah and others.

He said the techniques were "lawful, safe and effective," and approved by the Justice Department and executive branch. But the CIA wanted to make sure it was within the law, "So, on its own, the CIA began to videotape interrogations," he said.

He said the CIA stopped the taping because officials concluded it was not needed as a backup to the agency's other means of documenting interrogations. It destroyed the tapes after making sure they had no more intelligence value and were not relevant to any inquiries.

Federal prosecutors revealed last month the CIA erroneously told a court in the Moussaoui case it did not have any interrogation recordings of certain "enemy combatants," when it in fact had two videotapes and an audiotape.

Moussaoui pleaded guilty and was sentenced to life in prison.