Former BOI staff in dismissal case

Two former Bank of Ireland employees, sacked for sending “pornographic” images through the company’s e-mail, have taken a case…

Two former Bank of Ireland employees, sacked for sending “pornographic” images through the company’s e-mail, have taken a case against the bank to the Employment Appeals Tribunal.

Sarah Rooney from Ballybrack and Sarah Murray from Glasthule both 25, were junior staff at the Bank of Ireland subsidiary ICS Building Society when they were fired in 2009.

Barrister for the bank Tom Mallon told the tribunal the two had circulated “extreme and revolting” pornography within and outside the bank and were guilty of “multiple breaches” of policy and gross misconduct.

However barrister Kevin D’Arcy, counsel for the claimants, said the mails were intended as “jocular” and the practice was endemic and known within the branch.

READ MORE

Mr D’Arcy put it to the tribunal that his clients were victims of a “culling of staff” at the bank especially female junior employees.

Giving evidence Larry O’Gara of the bank’s HR department said the case arose after the bank checked the e-mail account of another member of staff as part of an investigation into a separate matter. He said this mail box exposed “highly inappropriate” material being sent and received by members of staff.

Mr O’Gara brought this to the attention of a superior and a wider inquiry was launched. This investigation led to 33 inboxes from 37 separate staff being checked (four of the inboxes were not checked as the staff involved had either resigned, taken a career break or moved on within the organisation).

He said if an employee was found to have received one of the emails but then deleted it no disciplinary action was taken.

As a result the bank took disciplinary action against ten staff members - five of whom were dismissed, including the two claimants, and five were subject to lesser sanctions.

Mr O’Gara said employees were “fully aware” of the email policy in place at the bank and from an HR point of view it is a “no no” to circulate this type of material especially to another institution.

Among the images shown to the tribunal were two with the heading “Men in Training”, one showed a naked child urinating against a wall in a house while in the other a naked toddler pulled his mother’s nipple as she sunbathed topless on the beech.

Mr O’Gara described the images as “indecent, obscene pornography” and “certainly not related to the job” and he had “no doubt” the correct disciplinary action had been arrived at in both the claimants’ cases.

Mr D’Arcy questioned why of the people involved the 10 disciplined were all junior staff and all but one female.

He said Ms Rooney’s inbox contained e-mails of a similar nature sent to her from more senior members of staff. One entitled “Gary Glitter pops out for a Chinese” showed a child in a plastic bag and he questioned why the team leader who sent this was not disciplined by the bank.

Mr O’Gara said he was shocked by the image and admitted that either the investigating didn’t see the image or a decision was made not to take any action.

Mr Mallon put it to the tribunal that maybe these images were equally disturbing but it didn’t take away from the fact that the claimants had acted inappropriately.

He said: “If we didn’t fire enough people maybe not but I’m not interested [in others].

“If it is endemic we will sort it out,” he added.

The case was adjourned until Wednesday July 21st where it is expected to run for three or four days.

Luke Cassidy

Luke Cassidy

Luke Cassidy is Digital Production Editor of The Irish Times