Massacre of 57 was plotted over dinner, court told

MANILA – A family accused of massacring 57 people for political gain in the Philippines plotted the killings over dinner, a court…

MANILA – A family accused of massacring 57 people for political gain in the Philippines plotted the killings over dinner, a court heard today.

Servant Lakmudin Saliao gave evidence on the first day of the trial of the Ampatuan clan saying its head, Andal Ampatuan snr, gathered his relatives to ask them how they could stop a rival from running for provincial governor.

Former town mayor Andal Ampatuan jnr replied: “That’s easy. If they come here just kill them all,” Mr Saliao told the court.

He said the elder Ampatuan then asked his children if they agreed with the plan, and “Everybody laughed, saying it’s okay for everybody to be killed.” The trial taking place nearly 10 months after the November 23rd massacre in southern Maguindanao province exposed the shocking violence of Philippine politics.

READ MORE

Among the 57 dead were 30 media workers travelling in an election convoy.

Mr Saliao said Mr Ampatuan snr ordered that his rival, Esmael Mangudadatu, must be stopped on a road where he was supposed to pass on the way to file his candidacy papers.

On a nearby hilltop, troops found the 57 bodies gunned down and hastily buried along with some of the victims’ vehicles in mass graves.

Mr Mangudadatu, who was later elected governor in the May elections, had sent his wife, sisters and other female relatives accompanied by journalists in the belief that their lives would be spared.

On the day of the murders, Mr Saliao said Mr Ampatuan jnr told his father via mobile phone that he had blocked the convoy. The father ordered him to gun down everybody but spare the media, to which Mr Ampatuan jnr replied, “No . . . Somebody can talk if we won’t wipe out everybody.”

The Ampatuans have denied the charges.

Andal Ampatuan jnr and 16 policemen were the first to be charged and were led in handcuffs into the courtroom.

Nena Santos, lawyer of the Mangudadatus, described Mr Saliao’s testimony as “a smoking gun”. Mr Ampatuan jnr, who wore a yellow prison shirt, smiled and whispered to a lawyer as Mr Saliao gave evidence.

Nenita Oquindo, who lost her husband and daughter in the massacre, wept as he spoke.

The carnage drew international condemnation and prompted then president Gloria Macapagal Arroyo to impose martial law for a week as troops cracked down on the Ampatuans, her political allies.

A prominent senator, Joker Arroyo, has recently warned that the sheer volume of the case – at least 227 witnesses are listed by the prosecution and another 373 by the defence – means it could drag on for “200 years”.

An average criminal case takes about seven years to complete due to lack of prosecutors and judges and a huge backlog of cases. – (AP)