HARVARD ACADEMICS and students are demanding that the university rescind a plan to honour the editor-in-chief of a leading Washington political magazine this week after he wrote that Muslims did not deserve the protections of the US constitution and said “Muslim life is cheap”.
Martin Peretz has partially apologised for the comments. But critics say they are the most recent in a long line of bigoted columns in the review New Republicby the former Harvard professor that have drawn accusations of double standards in how the American media confront prejudice.
Mr Peretz caused a stir when he wrote in a column this month that Muslims in the US should not be entitled to constitutional guarantees of free speech. “Muslim life is cheap, most notably to Muslims . . . so, yes, I wonder whether I need honour these people and pretend that they are worthy of the privileges of the first amendment which I have in my gut the sense that they will abuse,” he said.
The comments provoked criticism from bloggers and academics but were initially ignored by mainstream newspapers despite Mr Peretz’s prominence – among other things he is a close friend of the former vice-president Al Gore – and the influence of his magazine.
Some of the strongest criticism has come from Harvard, where some students and academics are demanding the university cancel a ceremony tomorrow to name a $500,000 (€359,000) social studies chair after Mr Peretz.
Among the critics is Stephen Walt, a professor of international affairs at Harvard, who described Mr Peretz's views as hateful. "If you had said this about blacks, Jews or Catholics, it would be a scandal," he told the Boston Globe.
Mr Peretz has made two apologies, saying he was wrong to say Muslims should be stripped of their free speech rights. But he defended his assertion that Muslim life is cheap. “This is a statement of fact, not value,” he said. He made a further apology on the eve of the Jewish day of atonement, Yom Kippur, saying he had “publicly committed the sin of wild and wounding language”.
But some of his critics say he has a history of expressing views that would draw criticism from the mainstream press if they were not about Muslims. In March, he admitted to a prejudice against Arabs.
"Frankly, I couldn't quite imagine any venture requiring trust with Arabs turning out especially well. This is, you will say, my prejudice. But some prejudices are built on real facts, and history generally proves me right," he wrote in the New Republic.
Mr Peretz has said in conversation that he believes Palestinians are unfit to have their own country and suggested that Arabs are genetically violent.
Although he was criticised in a New York Times column after his recent comments, critics have contrasted the reticence of the American media over his views with the barrage of condemnation of the journalist Helen Thomas after she said Israel’s Jewish population should “go home” to Germany, Poland or the US. Mr Peretz was among her severest critics, calling her wicked and a Jew-hater.
Blogger Glenn Greenwald, who writes for Salon.com, accuses the US mainstream media of protecting Mr Peretz. “Marty Peretz has a lot of connections at the highest levels of media and politics . . . The way things work is that once you enter this realm of being respectable and serious it is almost as if anything goes.” – (Guardian Service)