Madam, - Michael O'Driscoll (July 3rd) refers to a substantial body of evidence that purports to describe the instability of gay relationships compared with heterosexual relationships. While there are some studies to support this view, there are many more that contradict it.
As committed gay relationships become more visible and common, there is increased possibility of robust study and analysis. The emerging literature has already challenged views that gay men and women are incapable of commitment.
The suggestion that gay people are more given to violence and other ills is simply not true. Research into human relationships, both gay and straight, has clearly demonstrated that they provide protective factors which support positive mental and physical health.
Commitment nurtures relationship. Strong relationships support the common good.
The problem with opinion and bias is that they can prevent us from standing back from the evidence and considering what it means. Mr O'Driscoll's assertion that psychological associations have been pressured to bow to political correctness over objective analysis of evidence must also be challenged.
Members of professional psychological bodies are bound to adhere to a strict ethical code that obliges them to engage in evidence-based practice, whatever their own political, religious or social beliefs.
I would ask anyone who holds to the views set forth by Mr O'Driscoll to consider their own biases by first reviewing the position papers, on this issue from the British Psychological Society and the American Psychological Association. - Yours, etc,
Dr COLM L. HUMPHRIES, Griffinrath Hall, Maynooth, Co Kildare.