Rugby authorities have been told they should look to eliminate contact training and reduce the global calendar after a study revealed evidence of considerably increased risk of motor neurone disease among former players.
A study led by the University of Glasgow looking at former Scotland internationals – from the amateur era and later professional players – found ex-players had more than twice the risk of a neurodegenerative disease, and a 15 times higher risk of a motor neurone disease diagnosis.
Consultant neuropathologist Professor Willie Stewart, who led the research, said it raised immediate questions for rugby authorities to mitigate the risks.
“I am genuinely concerned about what is happening in the modern game, and that if, in 20 years’ time, we repeat this study we would see something even more concerning” Prof Stewart said.
“Rugby has talked a lot and done a lot about head injury management and whether it can reduce head injury during [training]. Those conversations have gone on a while and the pace of progress is pretty slow.
[ Concussion proceedings by three Irish rugby players to be followed by othersOpens in new window ]
“This should be a stimulus to them to pick up their heels to make some pretty dramatic changes as quickly as possible to try and reduce risk.
“Instead of talking about extending seasons and introducing new competitions and global seasons they should be talking about restricting it as much as possible, cutting back on the amount of rugby we’re seeing and getting rid of as much training as possible.
“Things like that have to be addressed pretty rapidly.”
The study, published in the Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, compared health outcomes among 412 male Scottish former internationals and more than 1,200 matched individuals from the general population.
It was part-funded by the Football Association and Professional Footballers’ Association, building on a landmark 2019 study which found former professional footballers had an approximately three and a half times higher rate of death from neurodegenerative disease than expected.
Prof Stewart said the numbers had come as a “big surprise” and more work – including a broader study – was needed to fully understand their meaning, although the immediate message for the game was clear.
“The hypothesis we’re working on is that head injury exposure in sport increases the risk of neurodegenerative diseases and we’re finding that over and again,” he said. “The story we’re getting from all evidence is that exposure to head injuries is a risk we need to do something about.
“The modern game, from 1995 onwards, has seen that head injury exposure go up and up and up, as far as I’m concerned.”
Asked what steps should be taken, he added: “Contact training during the week should be viewed as virtually a thing of the past, getting rid of as much as possible.
“Look at the number of matches being played and ask, ‘Is this credible that young men and women can be playing week-in, week-out, for the majority of the year just for entertainment?’
“I know it’s tough to think about there being less rugby rather than more, but maybe less is more if you see better quality rugby, the players are less damaged and fitter.
“You can’t continue to put young men and women through what they’re being put through now we know even from the amateur era there’s this risk of brain disease.”
Dr Susan Kohlhaas, director of research at Alzheimer’s Research UK, called for further research into head injuries in sport.
[ Activity, not rest - Reframing the narratives on the treatment of concussionOpens in new window ]
She said: “It’s concerning to see research identify former male rugby players as being at increased risk of dementia, and at particularly high risk of the neurodegenerative condition motor neurone disease.
“There are still uncertainties over the exact size of the risk – for example, since motor neurone disease is a rare condition, there were no cases of MND in the aged-match controls and so much larger studies are needed to paint a clearer picture.
“Research that points the way to understanding and minimising the risks associated with head impacts, and how to balance these against the undoubted benefits of physical activity, is challenging but essential.
“At Alzheimer’s Research UK, we have outlined the most important priorities for researchers to complete the picture, including studying the impact of head injuries in women, at grass roots, and in the modern game, none of which were the focus of this research.
“As the leading dementia research charity, we’re already kick-starting further research into brain injury and the long-term risks of dementia with £500,000 of investment.”
