A girl who, it was claimed, was savagely attacked and bitten by a Collie dog on a Limerick farm nearly three years ago has settled a High Court action for €65,000.
Alice Candido da Costa, who is from Brazil, had at the time been staying in a house on the farm when it was claimed she was bitten by a brown and white Collie.
The High Court heard the three-year-old girl suffered a bite to the face and has been left with scarring, but it has improved over time.
The girl’s mother, who was cooking in the kitchen at the time, heard her daughter scream and found her bleeding.
Conor McGregor presidential bid: All but one of 188 councillors would not vote for MMA fighter, survey shows
Ireland weather: Sunshine and temperatures up to 17 degrees expected, say Met Éireann
Adolescence in teenagers’ own words: ‘Parents have absolutely no idea’
Steve Wall: ‘When Bono was offered the medal, I tweeted: Surely he won’t accept that. I didn’t know he already had’
Alice had, through her mother Emanuelle Dos Santos Candido, sued the owners of the dog and farm, Seamus and Alice Noonan of Ballyduhig, Co Limerick over the attack on July 17th, 2022.
At the time, the girl lived with her parents in a house on the farm at Ballyduhig.
It was claimed that at about noon, the girl was playing with another child in the yard of the house when the dog attacked her without any provocation.
The girl was taken to the emergency department of University Hospital Limerick, where she was found to have a fracture to her jaw and lacerations to her face and chest.
The lacerations were cleaned and sutured but she had to undergo surgery to fix to the jaw fracture and was in hospital for five days.
The family returned to live in Brazil two months later and the metal work in her jaw was later removed. It was claimed she also suffered dental sequelae and had to have dental treatment.
A medical examination last November showed that Alice had numerous well-healed scars on her cheeks, chin and chest as a result of the attack and she now has an anxiety around dogs
In the proceedings it was claimed there was an alleged failure to ensure the land was free of hazard and there was an alleged failure to adequately supervise or control the dog and it had allegedly been allowed to roam unsupervised.
It was further claimed there was an alleged failure to warn residents or visitors to the house located on the farm of the presence of a dangerous or potentially dangerous dog.
Approving the settlement, Ms Justice Jackson said the mother must have got an awful fright and it was very distressing for them.
