Sir, – The complex matter of democratic representation is taken in a new direction by Joe Humphreys, as he considers whether animals should be given political representation (“Some people believe animals should have political representation. But which animals?”, Unthinkable, Opinion & Analysis, October 7th).
His concern over which animals might be preferred is one legitimate topic but their political aims might also give us pause.
I’d imagine anyone representing fish might be more sanguine about rising sea levels, for example. Similarly, the redirection of the Gulf Stream, which could cool large areas of the northern hemisphere dramatically, might be quite acceptable to anyone representing polar bears.
And, as the timing of bumper Christmas social welfare payments is being clarified, stipends which boost the capacity of Irish families to celebrate Yuletide, I wonder if representatives of the turkey population would vote for it? – Yours, etc,
European political centre may regret borrowing from far-right’s migration playbook
Today’s 25-year-olds are a worried bunch and they’re not just sweating the small stuff
Dave Hannigan: Sad spectacle as Marion Jones bids to rebuild her ruined brand
‘I’ve been blind to the fact that my partner is actually married to his mother’
BRIAN O’BRIEN,
Kinsale,
Co Cork.
