Sir, - I suspect that the proposal to "set aside" places at university for the "socially disadvantaged" and "mature students" would be unconstitutional. For example, an 18-year-old school leaver could be refused a place at university even though his/her results in the Leaving Certificate are superior to someone who has just retired and has received a large golden handshake or someone whose parents successfully under-declare their income to the Revenue Commissioners.
Ignoring the question of whether the Leaving Certificate is a proper measure by which to gauge suitability for a university course, reverse discrimination removes personal responsibility: "You are not good enough to get accepted for university on your own merit so we will lower the entry criteria for you."
A better alternative is to re-introduce university fees and to create a proper student loan system. Future tax payments by a former student could also reduce the amount of the loan outstanding. This system would encourage persons from all sectors of society to go to university; to work in Ireland; and to get a job after leaving university. It would also reward sturdy self-reliance. - Yours, etc.,
Fintan Clancy, Hampstead, London NW3.