Tesla chief executive Elon Musk said on Thursday the company will hold a shareholder vote to transfer its state of incorporation to Texas from Delaware, days after a judge invalidated his $56 billion (€51.5 billion) pay package at the electric vehicle maker.
On Tuesday, Delaware judge Kathaleen McCormick called the 2018 share-based pay package, the largest in corporate America, “an unfathomable sum” that was unfair to shareholders and found it was negotiated by directors who appeared beholden to Mr Musk.
“Never incorporate your company in the state of Delaware,” Mr Musk posted on social media X shortly after the ruling.
Mr Musk’s idea, should he actually go through with the vote, is not without risk. Legal experts said he would almost certainly be sued by investors if he tried to move the state of incorporation to Texas, particularly if it was seen as a move to secure his pay package rather than obtain some benefit for Tesla.
Parties’ general election manifestos struggle to make the figures add up
On his return to Web Summit, the often outspoken chief executive Paddy Cosgrave is now an epitome of caution
Surviving a shake-up: is restructuring ever good for staff?
The Irish Times Business Person of the Month: Dalton Philips, Greencore
“Elon Musk’s plan to change Tesla’s state of incorporation from Delaware to Texas is typical behaviour for the entrepreneur who always looks for an alternative if he can’t get what he wants,” said Dan Coatsworth, investment analyst at AJ Bell.
Getting shareholders on board could be another hurdle for Mr Musk.
“Shareholders need to take a hard look at how transitioning out of Delaware might impact their rights and the company’s governance,” independent business adviser Keith Donovan said.
The company’s shares reversed course to trade down 1.2 per cent. They are down about 25 per cent this year due to growing concerns of soft electric vehicle (EV) demand after more than doubling in 2023.
The ruling is not the first time that Mr Musk has suffered a setback in Delaware.
Ms McCormick was the same judge who oversaw Twitter’s July, 2022 lawsuit against Mr Musk after he tried to back out of his contract to buy the social media platform for $44 billion (€40 billion). The judge rejected his delaying tactics and Mr Musk finally went through with the deal to buy the company.
“Musk must believe that Texas judges are more ‘business friendly’ than their Delaware counterparts ... Musk must be assuming that Texas judges will, with the discretion they have to assess executive pay, take a more relaxed approach to the issue than Delaware judges,” said Brian Cheffins, a professor of corporate law at Cambridge University.
“It is far from clear Texas judges will do so.”
More than 65 per cent of Fortune 500 companies and over half of all US publicly traded companies are incorporated in Delaware, lured by the state’s business-friendly legal framework and tax policies, according to Harvard Business Services, a firm offering Delaware business formation services.
US public companies look to incorporate in Delaware for access to the state’s courts. Its corporate law places greater restraints on management and is more protective of investors than states such as Nevada, making it cheaper for Delaware companies to raise capital.
TripAdvisor and its parent company are currently defending a lawsuit by their shareholders, who have challenged the company’s plans to reincorporate in Nevada from Delaware.
Musk has also recently said he would be uncomfortable growing the automaker to be a leader in artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics without having at least 25 per cent voting control of the company, nearly double his current stake.
His stake was larger before his purchase of X, then known as Twitter, but he sold billions of dollars of shares in 2022 partly to help finance that $44 billion purchase.
– Reuters
