Another trial due after jury hung over sex abuse claims

Woman accused of sexually molesting young girl 15 years ago faces further proceedings

A Downpatrick Crown Court jury   deliberated for three and a half hours over two days before telling the court they could not agree on verdicts  against Karen Walker (30), accused of sexually molesting a little girl 15 years ago.
A Downpatrick Crown Court jury deliberated for three and a half hours over two days before telling the court they could not agree on verdicts against Karen Walker (30), accused of sexually molesting a little girl 15 years ago.

A woman accused of sexually molesting a little girl 15 years ago faces another trial after a jury failed to reach verdicts on Friday.

The Downpatrick Crown Court jury of six men and five women had deliberated for a total of three and a half hours over two days before telling the court they could not agree on verdicts of guilt or innocence against 30-year-old Karen Walker.

They had deliberated for two hours on Thursday and were given a majority direction on Friday morning with trial Judge Gordon Kerr QC indicating that he could accept verdicts on the five counts where at least 10 jury members were agreed.

Despite that direction and a further hour of deliberations, the foreperson indicated the jury was hung.

READ MORE

Two charges

Ms Walker, from the Bexley Road in Bangor, faces two charges of indecent assault and three counts relating to acts of gross indecency with a child on dates between January 1st, 1998, and January 17th, 2000, when her alleged victim was between seven and 10 years old.

Opening the prosecuting case against Ms Walker last Monday, prosecuting lawyer Samuel Magee claimed Ms Walker touched the girl's private parts and incited the alleged victim to touch her after telling her: "I'll be the man and you be the woman."

He told the jury that sometimes Ms Walker reversed the ascribed roles but that she allegedly told her victim the alleged sexual activity was “our wee thing”.

Mr Magee said while he accepted Ms Walker herself would have been a young teenager at the time of the alleged abuse, “She was old enough, we say, to know what she was doing and to comprehend how inappropriate her actions were.”

The lawyer described how the alleged victim could remember the first incident when Ms Walker convinced her to change her lower clothing to tracksuit bottoms before allegedly touching her private parts.

“She even remembers the brand of tracksuit bottoms,” said Mr Magee, adding that on the Crown case, she changed at Ms Walker’s behest “to make it easier for the defendant to access the young girl’s intimate parts”.

‘Began rubbing herself’

The jury watched a 55-minute video of the alleged victim’s interview with police where she claimed that incident wasn’t “one-off”, further claiming there were other incidents where she was touched inappropriately or when Ms Walker “got on top of her and began rubbing herself” against the girl.

Ms Walker was arrested and interviewed about the allegations in August last year, but denied any wrongdoing.

Giving evidence on her own behalf, Ms Walker maintained her claims that she had done nothing wrong and had not engaged in any sexual activity with the child.

Following the jury's hung verdicts, Mr Magee told Judge Kerr there would be a retrial and asked for the case to be listed this Tuesday to set a date for that.