The German audit watchdog has told prosecutors that EY may have acted criminally during its work for Wirecard, a step that significantly escalates the legal and reputational risks for the accounting firm.
People familiar with the matter said that Apas, the watchdog, had sent a report to prosecutors. It is the first time a government agency has said EY may have broken the law during its audits of the German payments group, which collapsed this year after revealing a multiyear fraud.
Munich prosecutors told the Financial Times they were evaluating the evidence that was filed by Apas and had not yet come to a conclusion. Prosecutors have not launched a criminal investigation into current or former EY staff.
EY Germanysaid in a statement that it “vehemently rejects” the Apas suspicion that it acted criminally. It said that “based on our current state of knowledge, our colleagues conducted the audits professionally and in good faith” and that there were “absolutely no indications for criminally relevant misconduct by EY auditors in the Wirecard case”.
The auditor added: “EY has been fully supporting the investigations of the relevant government agencies from the start and will continue to do so.”
Corporate cash
For more than a decade, EY Germany had given Wirecard a clean bill of health before discovering this year that €1.9 billion in corporate cash did not exist. Wirecard subsequently collapsed into insolvency in one of Europe's biggest postwar accounting scandals.
At a parliamentary hearing in Berlin on Thursday, EY was criticised for its audit work. Alexander Geschonneck, a partner at rival firm KPMG, who led a special audit into Wirecard's accounting, told MPs that EY had been asked to confirm that it had followed normal procedures in checking bank account balances. He said the firm had not confirmed this.
“There was no account information and no bank documents,” he said, referring to the accounts where large amounts of cash were supposed to be held. “For 2016 to 2018, there was just nothing,” he said.
“What we did [in the special audit] was no rocket since. It wasn’t done [before by EY],” Mr Geschonneck said.
Danyal Bayaz, an MP for the Green party, said Mr Geschonneck’s testimony was “disastrous” for EY.
‘Proper annual audit’
Jens Zimmermann, MP for the Social Democrats, added: "A proper annual audit would have exposed the Wirecard fraud."
Apas, an independent government body overseeing Germany’s auditing industry, last year launched an investigation into EY’s work at Wirecard after the FT reported that many important clients of the firm seemed not to exist. The body can issue fines for misconduct and in extreme cases can disbar individual auditors.
Apas declined to comment, pointing to confidentiality rules.
According to people familiar with the matter, Apas filed an interim assessment of the case to criminal prosecutors in Berlin on September 29th and asked them to share the findings with criminal prosecutors in Munich. Berlin prosecutors told the FT that they have not launched an investigation against EY.
Reporting obligations
In the document, the watchdog said it found indications that the auditor potentially violated its legal due diligence and reporting obligations during the Wirecard audits. Under German law, auditors found guilty of such misconduct can be punished with up to three years in jail. German newspaper Handelsblatt first reported on the Apas document.
EY had earlier responded by quoting the Munich chief prosecutor Hildegard Bäumler-Hösl as saying that, “we currently do not see enough evidence for criminally relevant behaviour by EY auditors in the Wirecard case”.
However, Munich prosecutors on Thursday took issue with the statement, saying that EY had taken the quote out of context as it did not refer to the Apas letter. “We cannot confirm EY’s assessment that there are no indications for criminally relevant misconduct by EY in the Wirecard case as this is still being scrutinised,” the prosecutors added.
The FT reported in June that EY, for at least three years, failed to request account information directly from a Singapore bank where Wirecard claimed it held large sums of cash. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2020
