US regulators took over Silicon Valley Bank on Friday after a rush of deposit outflows and a plunge in its stock price led to uncertainty over the future of the tech-focused lender.
It is the second-largest bank failure in US history after the 2008 collapse of Washington Mutual.
The bank had abandoned its efforts to raise $2.25 billion (€2.1 billion) in new funding to cover losses on its bond portfolio earlier in the day and had been looking for a buyer to save it, according to people with knowledge of the matter.
SVB shares were halted during early trading on New York’s Nasdaq exchange, as its management tried to reassure investors.
File being prepared for DPP over insider trading
Christmas tech for kids: great gift ideas with safety features for parental peace of mind
MenoPal app offers proactive support to women going through menopause
Ezviz RE4 Plus review: Efficient budget robot cleaner but can suffer from wanderlust under the wrong conditions
New capital from the stock sale would have helped bridge the roughly $1.8 billion in losses SVB incurred from the sale of about $21 billion of securities initiated to cover customers withdrawing deposits from the bank.
It planned to sell $1.25 billion of its common stock to investors and an additional $500 million of mandatory convertible preferred shares, which are slightly less dilutive to existing shareholders.
SVB did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Its employees on Friday were asked by the company to work from home while the bank’s management team, led by chief executive Greg Becker, engages in conversations about potential next steps, according to two people familiar with the matter.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation said it would retain all of the deposits from SVB for later disposition. The regulator historically has sought to merge failed lenders with a larger and more stable institution. Washington Mutual, for example, was sold to JPMorgan Chase.
US bank failures have been extremely rare in recent years: there were none in 2020 and 2021, and the last time there were more than 10 was 2014.
The banking group’s troubles stem from a decision made at the peak of the tech boom to park $91 billion of its deposits in long-dated securities such as mortgage bonds and US Treasuries, which were deemed safe but are now worth $15 billion less than when SVB purchased them after the Federal Reserve aggressively raised interest rates.
On Thursday, SVB and its underwriter Goldman Sachs raced to complete the share offering. While Goldman had secured enough interest in the convertible bond deal by mid-afternoon, the common stock sale was struggling as SVB shares slid, according to one person with knowledge of the matter.
Private equity firm General Atlantic had committed to provide $500 million in equity if the offering had been completed. Goldman Sachs briefly worked to assemble a broader group of private capital investors, but that plan did not materialise because SVB’s shares fell so sharply, according to sources briefed on the matter.
The bank’s shares registered their biggest-ever decline on Thursday, wiping $9.6 billion from the banking group’s market capitalisation. SVB shares had fallen more than 60 per cent in pre-market trading on Friday before the halt was announced.
By Friday morning, the sale of shares and convertible bonds had been postponed, according to people familiar with the matter.
The ramifications of SVB’s troubles may be widely felt. The lender is the banking partner for half of US venture-backed tech and life sciences companies, and is a large presence in offering credit lines to the $10tn private capital industry.
Its customers had begun to grow increasingly fearful of the bank’s financial position, with some start-ups growing concerned enough to pull their cash.
Some venture capital groups told the Financial Times they were concerned by the decline in the value of SVB’s shares and were advising some of their portfolio companies to consider withdrawing a portion of their deposits from the lender. However, others said they were not giving that advice to their portfolio companies.
“SVB’s 40 years of business relationships supporting Silicon Valley evaporated in 14 hours,” said a senior executive at one multibillion-dollar venture capital fund. He said his firm had cautioned start-ups in which it invests to be “level-headed” and not to fuel a run on SVB on Thursday.
SVB’s decline, which was sparked by fears over interest rate-fuelled losses, has sparked contagion among financial stocks more broadly, drawing attention to the potential effect that rising interest rates could have on net interest income at other banks.
The four biggest US banks — JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Wells Fargo and Bank of America — also lost $52.4 billion of market value in Thursday trading.
Some smaller lenders, particularly those in California, fell sharply in early Friday trading. PacWest Bancorp fell as much as 25 per cent, while First Republic, a competitor to SVB, dropped more than 40 per cent before recovering most of its losses. --Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2023
