A nephew of a pensioner who allegedly took the body of his dead uncle to a Carlow post office last year in order to collect his pension payment has been remanded in custody.
Declan Haughney (41), of Pollerton Road, Carlow, and his co-accused Gareth Coakley (37), of John Sweeney Park, allegedly brought 66-year-old Peadar Doyle of Pollerton Road to claim his pension payment.
The alleged offences are said to have occurred at Hosey’s Post Office and shop, at Staplestown Road, Co Carlow, on January 21st, 2022.
Gardaí believe the pensioner was already dead when he was taken into the post office.
Markets in Vienna or Christmas at The Shelbourne? 10 holiday escapes over the festive season
Stealth sackings: why do employers fire staff for minor misdemeanours?
Michael Harding: I went to the cinema to see Small Things Like These. By the time I emerged I had concluded the film was crap
Look inside: 1950s bungalow transformed into modern five-bed home in Greystones for €1.15m
It is alleged Mr Haughney – Mr Doyle’s nephew – and Mr Coakley, who is on bail, attempted to collect a pension payment of €246 for Mr Doyle. Both are also accused of entering the post office at 11.04am where they “dishonestly induced by deception” a member of staff. Both charges are contrary to Section 6 of the Criminal Justice (Theft and Fraud Offences) Act, 2001.
The trial of the two men was expected to begin on Tuesday at Carlow Circuit Criminal Court. However, prosecution counsel Niall Storan informed the court the “case is not ready for trial yet”.
Judge Eugene O’Kelly adjourned the matter to be heard on February 22nd.
Mr Haughney, who is being held in Wheatfield Prison, was present in court. Mr Coakley was remanded on continuing bail until July 18th this year.
At a previous sitting of Carlow District Court in May last year, Det Garda Kieran Shields gave evidence of arrest, charge and caution of Mr Haughney.
Mr Haughney had originally been charged with two counts of deception in relation to the alleged use of a social welfare card. Det Shields informed the court that those charges were being dropped by the State.
Directions from the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) in the case were for the charges to be dealt with in the District Court, if there was a guilty plea.
However, Mr Haughney has repeatedly indicated at various court dates that he would be contesting the charges.