A farmer has been ordered by the High Court to remove a milking parlour he built without planning permission by September 19th.
Patrick Furlong must cease milking operations by July 21st and in the meantime his herd must be moved to another farm with “a lawful milking facility”, ruled Mr Justice Garret Simons on Tuesday.
Mr Furlong built the parlour and associated works, including slurry storage and parlour washing tanks, at his 24.7-acre farm in Gurteen, Templeshambo, Co Wexford in 2020. It had been a dry stock farm before this.
Wexford County Council served warning and enforcement notices in 2020 requiring him to cease the unauthorised development and restore the lands to their previous condition.
I went to the cinema to see Small Things Like These. By the time I emerged I had concluded the film was crap
Forêt restaurant review: A masterclass in French classic cooking in Dublin 4
‘I’m hoping at least one girl who is on the fence about reporting her violent boyfriend ... will read about my case’
What Fine Gael, Fianna Fáil and the Greens promised in 2020 - and how much they delivered
Mr Furlong then made a retention application but it was refused on grounds including that he had not demonstrated there was sufficient effluent storage capacity on the site and it was not clear the development would comply with the Nitrates Directive which is aimed at protecting water from pollution from agricultural sources.
The council also refused it on grounds that the entrance created a traffic hazard on a county road and would be contrary to the proper planning and sustainable development of the area. Several retention applications and appeals followed.
Mr Furlong brought High Court judicial review proceedings over the decision 13 months ago but these are still pending.
Mr McCann, represented by David Browne SC, then brought enforcement proceedings in the Circuit Court which in April last year ordered the cessation of the unauthorised development and reinstatement of the lands. The court placed a stay of 12 months on the order.
Mr Furlong appealed that decision to the High Court which on Tuesday dismissed the appeal.
The judge said it would be inappropriate to put a stay on the orders to allow Mr Furlong an opportunity to make what would be a fourth attempt to obtain a form of retrospective development consent through what is known as substitute consent. “With respect, no developer is entitled to this level of indulgence,” he said.
This was “a clear-cut case of unauthorised development”, he added.
The removal of unauthorised structures and reinstatement of the lands is to be done by midnight on September 19th, he said.
- Sign up for push alerts and have the best news, analysis and comment delivered directly to your phone
- Join The Irish Times on WhatsApp and stay up to date
- Listen to our Inside Politics podcast for the best political chat and analysis