Lately, in the ongoing conversation about how to defeat coronavirus, experts have referred to the “Swiss cheese model” of pandemic defence. The metaphor is easy enough to grasp: multiple layers of protection, imagined as cheese slices, block the spread of the new coronavirus, Sars-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid-19. No one layer is perfect; each has holes, and when the holes align the risk of infection increases. But several layers combined – social distancing, plus masks, plus hand-washing, plus testing and tracing, plus ventilation, plus government messaging – significantly reduce the overall risk. Vaccination will add one more protective layer.
"Pretty soon you've created an impenetrable barrier, and you really can quench the transmission of the virus," says Julie Gerberding, an American medic who is chief patient officer at the US pharmaceutical company Merck. "But it requires all of those things, not just one of those things... I think that's what our population is having trouble getting their head around. We want to believe that there is going to come this magic day when suddenly 300 million doses of vaccine will be available, and we can go back to work, and things will return to normal. That is absolutely not going to happen fast."
This multilayered approach to reducing risk is used in many industries, especially those where failure could be catastrophic
Rather, Gerberding says, expect to see “a gradual improvement in protection, first among the highest-need groups, and then more gradually among the rest of us.” Until vaccines are widely available and taken, she says, “we will need to continue masks and other commonsense measures to protect ourselves and others.”
In October, Bill Hanage, an epidemiologist at the Harvard TH Chan school of public health, retweeted an infographic rendering of the Swiss-cheese model, noting that it included "things that are personal and collective responsibility – note the 'misinformation mouse' busy eating new holes for the virus to pass through."
“One of the first principles of pandemic response is, or ought to be, clear and consistent messaging from trusted sources,” Hanage says. “Unfortunately the independence of established authorities like the CDC has been called into question, and trust needs to be rebuilt as a matter of urgency,” he adds, referring to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A catchy infographic is a powerful message, he notes, but ultimately requires higher-level support.
The Swiss-cheese concept originated with James Reason, a cognitive psychologist, now a professor emeritus at the University of Manchester, in his 1990 book, Human Error. A succession of disasters in the 1980s, including the Challenger shuttle explosion, the Bhopal fatal gas leak, and the Chernobyl nuclear-reactor explosion, motivated the concept, and it became known as the "Swiss-cheese model of accidents", with the holes in the cheese slices representing errors that accumulate and lead to adverse events.
The cheese metaphor now pairs fairly well with the coronavirus pandemic. Ian Mackay, a virologist at the University of Queensland, in Brisbane, Australia, saw a smaller version on Twitter but thought that it could do with more slices, more information. He created, with collaborators, the Swiss Cheese Respiratory Pandemic Defence and engaged his Twitter community, asking for feedback and putting the visualisation through many iterations. Now circulating widely, the infographic has been translated into more than two dozen languages.
“This multilayered approach to reducing risk is used in many industries, especially those where failure could be catastrophic,” Mackay says. “Death is catastrophic to families, and for loved ones, so I thought Prof Reason’s approach fit in very well during the circulation of a brand-new, occasionally hidden, sometimes severe and occasionally deadly respiratory virus.”
The following is an edited version of a recent email conversation with Mackay.
What does the Swiss cheese model show?
The real power of this infographic – and James Reason's approach to account for human fallibility – is that it's not really about any single layer of protection or the order of them but about the additive success of using multiple layers, or cheese slices. Each slice has holes or failings, and those holes can change in number and size and location, depending on how we behave in response to each intervention.
Take masks as one example of a layer. Any mask will reduce the risk that you will unknowingly infect those around you, or that you will inhale enough virus to become infected. But it will be less effective at protecting you and others if it doesn’t fit well, if you wear it below your nose, if it’s only a single piece of cloth, if the cloth is a loose weave, if it has an unfiltered valve, if you don’t dispose of it properly, if you don’t wash it, or if you don’t sanitise your hands after you touch it. Each of these are examples of a hole. And that’s in just one layer.
To be as safe as possible and to keep those around you safe, it’s important to use more slices to prevent those volatile holes from aligning and letting virus through.
What have we learned since March?
Distance is the most effective intervention; the virus doesn't have legs, so if you are physically distant from people, you avoid direct contact and droplets. Then you have to consider inside spaces, which are especially in play during winter or in hotter countries during summer: the bus, the gym, the office, the bar or the restaurant. That's because we know Sars-CoV-2 can remain infectious in aerosols (small floaty droplets) and we know that aerosol spread explains Covid-19 superspreading events. Try not to be in those spaces with others, but if you have to be, minimise your time there (work from home if you can) and wear a mask. Don't go grocery shopping as often. Hold off on going out, parties, gatherings. You can do these things later.
We don’t talk about eye coverings much, but we should, because we don’t know enough about the role of eyes in transmission. We do know that eyes are a window to the upper respiratory tract.
Where does the "misinformation mouse" fit in?
The misinformation mouse can erode any of those layers. People who are uncertain about an intervention may be swayed by a loud and confident-sounding voice proclaiming that a particular layer is ineffective. Usually, that voice is not an expert on the subject at all. When you look to the experts – usually to your local public health authorities or the World Health Organisation – you'll find reliable information.
An effect doesn’t have to be perfect to reduce your risk and the risk to those around you. We need to remember that we’re all part of a society, and if we each do our part, we can keep each other safer, which pays off for us as well. Another example: We look both ways for oncoming traffic before crossing a road. This reduces our risk of being hit by a car but doesn’t reduce it to zero. A speeding car could still come out of nowhere. But if we also cross with the lights, and keep looking as we walk, and don’t stare at our phone, we drastically reduce our risk of being hit.
We’re already used to doing that. When we listen to the loud nonexperts who have no experience in protecting our health and safety, we are inviting them to have an impact in our lives. That’s not a risk we should take. We just need to get used to these new risk-reduction steps for today’s new risk – a respiratory virus pandemic instead of a car.
What is our individual responsibility?
We each need to do our part: stay apart from others, wear a mask when we can't, think about our surroundings, for example. But we can also expect our leadership to be working to create the circumstances for us to be safe – like regulations about the air exchange inside public spaces, creating quarantine and isolation premises, communicating specifically with us (not just at us), limiting border travel, pushing us to keep getting our health checks, and providing mental health or financial support for those who suffer or can't get paid while in a lockdown.
How can we make the model stick?
We each use these approaches in everyday life. But for the pandemic, this all feels new and like a lot of extra work – because everything is new. In the end, though, we're just forming new habits, like navigating our latest phone's operating system or learning how to play that new console game I got for my birthday. It might take some time to get across it all, but it's worthwhile. In working together to reduce the risk of infection, we can save lives and improve health.
And as a bonus, the multilayered risk-reduction approach can even decrease the number of times we get the flu or a bad chest cold. Also, sometimes slices sit under a mandate; it’s important we also abide by those rules and do what the experts think we should. They’re looking out for our health. – New York Times
