Prince Harry said on Tuesday that "Megxit", a phrase used by the British press to describe the decision by him and his wife, Meghan Markle, to quit their royal duties, was a misogynistic term
He said the word was an example of online and media hatred. “Maybe people know this and maybe they don’t, but the term Megxit was or is a misogynistic term, and it was created by a troll, amplified by royal correspondents, and it grew and grew and grew into mainstream media. But it began with a troll.” He did not elaborate.
He was speaking by video on a panel called The Internet Lie Machine, organised by the US technology and culture magazine Wired, at which he also said he told Twitter boss Jack Dorsey the day before the Capitol riots in Washington, DC, on January 6th that "his platform was allowing a coup to be staged". "That email was sent the day before, and then it happened, and I haven't heard from him since," Harry said.
Harry and Meghan, formally known as the duke and duchess of Sussex, moved to California last year to lead a more independent life. Harry has said that part of the reason for their departure was the racist treatment of Meghan, whose mother is black and whose father is white, by the British tabloid media.
A study released in October by a social-media analytics service, Bot Sentinel, identified 83 accounts on Twitter that it said were responsible for 70 per cent of the hateful content and misinformation aimed at Meghan and Harry.
Referring to the study, Harry said on Tuesday that “perhaps the most disturbing part of this was the number of British journalists who were interacting with them and amplifying the lies. But they regurgitate these lies as truth.”
Harry and Meghan have since campaigned against social-media negativity that they say is affecting people’s mental health.
On Tuesday Harry called misinformation a global humanitarian crisis. Speaking of his mother, Princess Diana, who died in a Paris car crash while being chased by paparazzi, Harry added, "I learned from a very early age that the incentives of publishing are not necessarily aligned with the incentives of truth.
“I know the story all too well. I lost my mother to this self-manufactured rabidness, and obviously I’m determined not to lose the mother to my children to the same thing.” – Reuters
