Boy partially blinded by wand from school play loses claim

Child’s family had sued the Western Education and Library Board for alleged negligence

A boy partially blinded after being hit in the eye by a classmate waving her fairy wand during a school play dress rehearsal has lost a High Court battle for damages
A boy partially blinded after being hit in the eye by a classmate waving her fairy wand during a school play dress rehearsal has lost a High Court battle for damages

A boy partially blinded after being hit in the eye by a classmate waving her fairy wand during a school play dress rehearsal has lost a High Court battle for damages.

The child’s family had sued the Western Education and Library Board for alleged negligence over the accident which occurred when he was aged nine.

Mr Justice Stephens on Friday backed their account that he did lose the sight in his left eye due to being struck by the girl said to have been casting a spell at the time.

But he held that the teachers at the primary school in Co Derry had properly assessed the wand and supervised the rehearsal.

READ MORE

Dismissing the claim, the judge said: “I do not consider the plaintiff has established any fault on the part of the defendant.”

The boy at the centre of the action was injured back in 2009. He had been onstage at the time with up to 200 other pupils getting ready for a production of their school play.

The court heard another girl dressed as a fairy had been allowed to carry a wand with a star on it which allegedly inflicted the injury.

Delivering judgment, Mr Justice Stephens praised the boy and his mother for the honesty of their evidence. Even though questions were raised over which eye was struck, the judge found it had been the one in which he subsequently lost sight.

Dealing with the issue of liability, however, he said the teacher with responsibility at the time had carried out an assessment of the wand and the girl holding it.

“The overwhelming evidence is the particular girl was timid and not likely to behave in an inappropriate way,” he pointed out.

Entering judgment for the defendant, Mr Justice Stephens confirmed: “The rehearsal was appropriately supervised.”