Future of homeless hostel uncertain following High Court ruling

The facility opened before Christmas 2016 and has been used as emergency temporary accommodation

Mr Justice Donald Binchy held that a decision by DCCl to allow Carman’s Hall be used and converted into a hostel was in material contravention of the area’s local development plan. Photograph: Google Maps
Mr Justice Donald Binchy held that a decision by DCCl to allow Carman’s Hall be used and converted into a hostel was in material contravention of the area’s local development plan. Photograph: Google Maps

The future of a Dublin City centre based hostel used as accommodation for homeless people is uncertain following a ruling by the High Court on Wednesday.

In his judgment Mr Justice Donald Binchy held that a decision by Dublin City Council (DCC) to allow Carman's Hall, Francis Street, in Dublin's Liberties be used and converted into a hostel was in material contravention of the area's local development plan.

The facility opened before Christmas 2016 and has been used as emergency temporary accommodation for rough sleepers.

It has a capacity of 51 beds and has been run by the Simon Community and the Salvation Army.

READ MORE

Local residents through the Carman’s Hall Community Interest Group, Michael Mallin House Resident’s Association and community worker Elizabeth O’Connor brought High Court proceedings claiming DCC was not entitled to convert the building into a hostel for the homeless.

They alleged the council’s decision of October 28th 2016 authorising change of use and refurbishment of the building is unlawful and in breach of the planning laws and should be quashed.

Community centre

The residents want the building, owned by the Catholic Archdiocese of Dublin, to be used as a community centre.

They claim the hall was used as a community centre for many years before it was closed in 2013 over accessibility and fire safety concerns.

The council opposed the application argues the hostel was opened to deal with the “humanitarian crisis” of rough sleepers in Dublin.

In his judgment he said that it was accepted that the hall was converted into a shelter for the homeless in order to deal with what is an emergency situation.

However he found that DCC’s decision was in material contravention with objectives as set out in the local development plan for the south inner city.

Proposer consideration he said was not given to claims that the hostel would result in an over concentration of such facilities for the homeless in the one the one area and the effects that would have on the local economy and community.

In the circumstances the court was satisfied to quash the orders made by DCC in respect of the building.

The judge said he was conscious of the impact the court’s decision will have on the homeless situation.

He adjourned the matter to allow the parties consider his judgment to November 8th next.

The hostel will remain open pending any decision made by the court on that date.