Ireland is not a "failed state" and its people should not accept phoney reform in abolishing the Seanad, former minister for justice Michael McDowell has told the Parnell Summer School.

Addressing the theme 'Parnell & Kennedy: Lost Leaders' this afternoon, and taking a cue from JF Kennedy's dictum; "Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country", Mr Mc Dowell called for a new sense of patriotism and loyalty to the Constitution.

He said some commentators “seem to enjoy wallowing in what I have termed as a ‘middle-class self-hatred’ or negativity. It is easy to be critical; it is hard to be constructive, especially during times of economic crisis”.

He recalled the 1998 amendment to the Constitution which he said redefined the nation as one which aspires to include all the people of Ireland, “in all the diversities of their identities and traditions”.

“Those words are important” he said, arguing that the State had opened up its sense of patriotism and republicanism “to build and develop on this island a republican State which is not mainly or exclusively Catholic, but is open to all traditions and identities”.

But he said “a particularly striking historical nonsense” was the belief by the “post-Marxist left” that republicanism equated with socialism, and a failure to deliver on socialism was a betrayal of the Republic. “The two ideals are not equivalents” he said.

He said loyalty to the State and the Constitution demanded loyalty to the institutions of government which “by and large have served the citizens well”.

He also said the Constitution had not failed the people and the three pillars of government - legislature, the executive and the judiciary - were not failed institutions “in concept”.

Mr McDowell said proposals for reform may be worthy and legitimate only if they were motivated by a desire for improvement in the way the State functions. But he said the proposals to abolish the Seanad based on cost were “threadbare and illegitimate”.

He said the actual cost of the Seanad was about €1.60 per year for each citizen and “abolitionists” wanted to postpone any supposed savings for three years - spending €14 million now on a referendum to achieve “small savings” in three years, he argued.

"Do we really want now to slam the door shut on non-TD expert participants in Government such as [former minister] James Dooge?" he asked. "Do we also want to turn down the possibility of having Northern voices such as Gordon Wilson or Seamus Mallon, or people such as Mary Robinson and Ken Whitaker in our parliament?"

He suggested abolition of the Seanad was “a crude attempt to ride the wave of public disillusionment with phony reform based on phony cost arguments”.

Mr McDowell said he believed loyalty to the State involved a duty on every citizen to participate and be responsible in shaping the democratic process, but “corrosive cynicism about politics” damaged democracy.

“Our commentariat, in the last analysis, must acknowledge that we as citizens choose our politicians” he said, adding that politicians were not the enemy.

“Politics is the process that we as citizens choose it to be. We should not cannibalise the Constitution in the name of reform,” he said.