The French president has given Boris Johnson until the end of the week to fundamentally revise his Brexit plan, in a move that increases the chances of the negotiations imploding within days.
The UK proposals tabled last week are not regarded in Brussels as being a basis for a deal and Emmanuel Macron emphasised it was up to the UK to think again before an upcoming EU summit.
After declining to meet the prime minister in person, Mr Macron further insisted during a phone call on Sunday that the talks would only be advanced through Michel Barnier, the EU's chief negotiator.
"Boris Johnson presented his latest proposals," an official at the Élysée Palace said of the conversation. "The president told him that the negotiations should continue swiftly with Michel Barnier's team in coming days, in order to evaluate at the end of the week whether a deal is possible that respects European Union principles."
Mr Barnier has already said he does not have a mandate from the EU27 to agree a deal on the terms so far presented by Downing Street.
The prime minister's chief negotiator, David Frost, has also been repeatedly told there will no last-minute negotiations with leaders at the summit on October 17th.
The British proposals involve the return of a customs border on the island of Ireland and a Democratic Unionist Party veto on Northern Ireland staying in the EU’s single market for goods, an arrangement designed to avoid checks on the Border.
Customs border
Mr Macron’s message to Mr Johnson echoed the words of the Dutch prime minister, Mark Rutte, who reportedly told the prime minister in a call on Saturday that the EU27 would not accept an agreement that created a customs border in Ireland. “Important questions remain about the British proposals,” Mr Rutte later tweeted.
Opposition MPs are expected on Monday to push for a vote demanding publication of the full 40-page legal text of the alternative backstop plan presented to the EU by the UK. So far only a seven-page explanatory note has been published.
The shadow Brexit secretary, Keir Starmer, said it was important to see the legal detail “because we suspect it will confirm that the government’s proposals unavoidably mean the introduction of infrastructure in Northern Ireland, and that this will contradict the assurances that Johnson gave in the house on Thursday [that no new infrastructure would be required]”. Mr Starmer also said the legal text would clarify whether or not workers’ rights were being protected.
Opposition MPs have been able in the past to use Commons standing order 24 to trigger an emergency debate on a binding “humble address” motion demanding the release of government papers, but such a debate would only go ahead with the approval of the Speaker.
With just a few days remaining for the UK to backtrack on key aspects of its proposals, officials in Brussels described the talks as a “farce”.
The two sides appear locked in an impasse. Mr Frost told European commission officials on Friday the UK would not move on its negotiating position until Brussels accepted its main proposals as a basis for the talks.
‘Take-it-or-leave-it’
Mr Johnson's most senior adviser, Dominic Cummings, has told Conservative aides that the government will not fundamentally change its proposals.
Meanwhile Latvia’s prime minister, Krišjanis Karinš, told the BBC the onus was on Mr Johnson to make a move. He said: “If the offer from the UK turns out to be a take-it-or-leave-it, it’s going to be very difficult I see in agreeing. It’s fully dependent on the will of Mr Johnson because, from the European side, we’re always open and looking towards a deal.”
Given the gap in positions, senior EU sources said Brussels had all but written off the chance of a deal being struck and that the onus was now on avoiding blame.
“Increasingly capitals have the impression the legal text was tabled to be rejected and never meant to be a basis for discussion,” said one EU diplomat.
Under the Benn Act, Mr Johnson will have to request an extension to the UK’s EU membership by October 19th if a deal has not been agreed.
In response to claims in the Sunday Telegraph that Mr Johnson would seek to provoke the EU to veto an extension by threatening to be an obstructive member state, one EU official described the government as “beyond pathetic”.
Claims that the government could veto the EU’s budget or impose Nigel Farage as the British commissioner were said to be “nonsense”.
The budget is unlikely to be finalised and put to a vote until June next year. The commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, or the European parliament can reject a member state’s nomination for a commissioner portfolio. – Guardian