The Irish Times view on the EU’s reaction to Donald Trump: conciliatory but defiant

The US president’s threats to support for Nato and his aggressive trade diplomacy leave no-one in any doubt that he is prepared to use leverage

Poland's prime minister Donald Tusk with European Council president Antonio Costa and president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen during an informal European Union (EU) leaders' meeting in Brussels on Monday. (Photo by John Thys / AFP)
Poland's prime minister Donald Tusk with European Council president Antonio Costa and president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen during an informal European Union (EU) leaders' meeting in Brussels on Monday. (Photo by John Thys / AFP)

The discussion among EU leaders was supposed to focus on European defence, issues such as finance and weapons production, but inevitably it became largely about dealing with the new US president. As they met on Monday he was threatening tariffs against China, Canada and Mexico – the latter two subsequently postponed in last-minutes deals – and warning the EU would be next. The leaders, meeting at their informal summit in Brussels, were preoccupied with sending a mix of conciliatory and defiant messages to Washington.

Ukraine has concentrated minds on shoring up the continent’s defences and pushed states towards accepting defence spending increases by individual member states to Trump’s ambitious 5 per cent of GDP. Frontline state Poland, desperate to maintain US engagement, has made it the central thrust of its EU presidency.

Trump’s re-election, however, with renewed demands for European burden-sharing, has brought a new urgency. His previous threats to US support for Nato and his aggressive trade diplomacy leave no-one in any doubt that he is prepared to use leverage, and that the Nato plans for a 3-3.5 per cent of GDP spending target will not be enough to convince.

EU states have increased military spending to €330 billion in 2024, up a third since 2021. And there are promises to go further but, one suspects, Monday’s agreement to change EU fiscal rules to ensure defence spending is not counted against deficit targets is unlikely to satisfy Trump. And the leaders were not able to agree on raising joint debt bonds to finance more defence spending.

READ MORE

On Greenland they sent a defiant message that the island is not for sale, with Nato secretary general Mark Rutte offering more Nato troops to the Arctic to protect it from supposed Russian and Chinese threats. EU leaders face a challenge to persuade voters of the need for more defence spending. And in neutral Ireland the issue is particularly contentious. But pressure will grow on this State, already facing calls to do much more to protect vital under-sea cables off its coast.