Sir, – There is a certain irony when Cormac Healy of Drinks Ireland accuses Alcohol Action Ireland of seeking “to conflate” alcohol and non-alcohol products in light of what appears to be clear and deliberate brand sharing (or brand conflation) by alcoholic drinks companies to exploit an obvious loophole in the Public Health Act 2018 (Letters, April 4th).
The claim made in the letter that alcohol and non-alcohol products are “distinct consumer offerings” is not backed up by their apparently similar branding, which at a glance, is often indistinguishable. In relation to the “fresh research”, which related to alcohol sales in a simulated online supermarket in England and Wales, it is not really a surprise that increasing the proportion of non-alcoholic drinks on a computer screen, (including soft drinks with high sugar content), reduces alcohol selection and online purchases.
The link made in the letter between the research’s limited findings and the on-pitch advertising of well-known alcoholic beer brands with 0.0 printed adjacent to them at sports events is tenuous and “seeks to conflate” online supermarket shopping with international sports events. – Yours, etc,
TOM KILBRIDE,
Joe Schmidt: ‘I felt if we could have built on our lead after half time’
‘It doesn’t have to be them or us’: Teachers behind new book of refugees’ stories want to challenge stereotypes
Ed Sheeran and Mary Robinson are right. It’s time to bin Band Aid
Podcast giant Joe Rogan may have played key role in US elections
Bray,
Co Wicklow.