Design work on Irish language signs at Belfast’s Grand Central Station has stopped due to “potential legal action”, Translink has said.
Stormont Minister for Infrastructure Liz Kimmins gave the go-ahead for the signage last week, but it has led to a row among ministers in the Executive.
Deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly said Ms Kimmins had a “legal duty” to bring the decision to the Executive.
DUP ministers have written to the Minister for Infrastructure asking how the decision was made.
Opposition walks out as new speaking time arrangements start
The Music Quiz: David Bowie’s Aladdin Sane was inspired by which Evelyn Waugh novel?
Irish composer John Buckley: ‘I never try to write music that’s difficult to play. It’s just the way it emerges’
UK pension buyback: I cannot find my national insurance number - what should I do?
They have also said they will bring up the row at Thursday’s Executive meeting.
Meanwhile, loyalist activist Jamie Bryson from the Unionist Voice Policy Studies (UVPS) group is attempting to secure a judicial review in the High Court in Belfast against the Department for Infrastructure, stating the decision was taken “without Executive approval”.
Ms Kimmins has said the inclusion of Irish on signs at the station would be a “hugely positive development”.
A Translink spokesperson said: “Design work to include the Irish language on physical signage and on ticket vending machines at Belfast Grand Central Station has now stopped pending potential legal action.
“The options to include Irish language on ticket vending machines would need to be further explored with the supplier.
“The options could include adding this to the current offering or making a substitute.”
The Department for Infrastructure said the decision to install the signs was taken directly by Ms Kimmins, and not by Translink, the publicly funded transport operator which owns the £340 million (€406.1 million) station.
Under Stormont rules, ministerial decisions that are deemed significant or controversial should be considered collectively by the powersharing coalition, rather than by an individual minister.
However, within the Executive it is ultimately the responsibility of Sinn Féin First Minister Michelle O’Neill and DUP Deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly to jointly decide what issues are significant or controversial and should be subject to a wider vote.
Ms Little-Pengelly told the BBC Good Morning Ulster programme that her concern was the cost of replacing signs that are “virtually new”.
She added: “The minister appears to have announced over the course of the last week that she is going to pull those out and replace those at a cost to the taxpayer of £120,000.
“I think there is genuine concern. This is a legitimate question to ask: why on earth would we be doing this at this time?”
The Deputy First Minister continued: “Any controversial or significant issue ought to be brought to the Executive. The minister has not done that so we have asked questions about what is the nature of this decision, we will be asking those questions as to why she has not brought that to the Executive.
“The key issue is to get that information and to ask the minister what she is doing. If it is an issue which is controversial or significant she has that legal duty under the legislation to bring that matter to the Executive.
“First of all, it is about making that absolutely clear to the minister. The minister then has a decision to make about bringing that. That decision is not rightfully taken, it is not a decision that she can take alone, she would need to bring that to the Executive, that is the stage we are at.
“All controversial and significant matters have to be brought to the Executive for Executive agreement. That is the law. The minister should want to abide by the law.”
Ms Little-Pengelly added: “To be putting new signs in to a building and then ripping them out a few months later to replace them on a particular agenda to me does not constitute value for money, it doesn’t constitute good decision-making.”
Ulster Unionist Party Minister for Health Mike Nesbitt said the cost of replacing the signage was an issue for him.
He said: “Could you imagine if I decided I wanted trilingual language on every building that delivered healthcare, whether it was hospitals, GP surgeries, social care venues? That would cost, I would imagine, tens and tens of millions of pounds while people are stuck on waiting lists for year after year.
“I am looking forward to discussing it with Executive colleagues on Thursday morning.”
He added: “One of the first questions I want to ask is why has this issue come to the fore so late in the day? Why did a previous minister not sort it out during the construction phase of Grand Central Station?”
Grand Central Station has been billed as the largest integrated transport hub on the island of Ireland, with services including trains between Belfast and Dublin. When the station opened last year disappointment was expressed by the Irish language community that the signage did not incorporate Irish.
Speaking at Westminster, Hilary Benn said: “That is a matter for the minister and the department in discussion with Translink, but look, my view is we should celebrate and respect all languages and all traditions in Northern Ireland.”
“It’s a matter in the end for the Infrastructure department and the Executive to sort out. But I repeat, we should respect all the languages and all traditions, because that’s the way in which Northern Ireland will continue to progress.”
– PA
