Mathematics deals with pure numbers: 1, 2, 3; fractions; and more exotic numbers such as pi. Since pi depends on lengths, we might think its value depends on our units. But it is the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter and, as long as both are measured in the same units — centimetres, inches or whatever — the ratio is always the same, a pure dimensionless number.
In applied mathematics, engineering, astronomy and so on, we deal with dimensional quantities: the mass of the Earth, power of an engine, lifetime of an atom, distance to a star.
All of these change their numerical value when the units of measurement change, just as prices change when we convert from dollars to euro.
The Navier-Stokes equations
Suppose we are designing a racing car or a jet aircraft. A scale model can be built and tested in a wind tunnel at a fraction of the cost of testing a full-scale prototype but, to guarantee that the behaviour of the model faithfully simulates the real system, we must ensure that they are dynamically similar, that the same mathematical equations with the same parameters describe both.
Christmas digestifs: buckle up for the strong stuff once dinner is done
Western indifference to Israel’s thirst for war defines a grotesque year of hypocrisy
Why do so many news sites look so boringly similar? Because they have to play by Google and Meta’s rules
Christmas dinner for under €35? We went shopping to see what the grocery shop really costs
The equations of fluid flow were formulated by French engineer Claude-Louis Navier and, more systematically, by Irish scientist George Gabriel Stokes. The Navier-Stokes equations have wide application, to aircraft, train and car design, air pollution analysis, ocean currents and weather prediction. Stokes is honoured by a commemorative plaque in the townland of Skreen, Co Sligo. Navier’s name is inscribed on the Eiffel Tower.
Transition to turbulence
A quantity in the equations called the coefficient of viscosity represents fluid friction. It is a dimensional number: when we apply the equations to a small-scale model, we must use a different value for this coefficient to maintain dynamic similarity. The ratio that we need to conserve is called the Reynolds number.
In 1883, Belfast-born Osborne Reynolds presented to the Royal Society his experiments with fluids, noting two distinct types of motion: laminar flow, where the fluid elements follow one another smoothly and steadily along clear lines and turbulent flow in which they move in sinuous, eddying paths that are chaotic and unpredictable.
Reynolds found that the transition from laminar to turbulent flow depends on the ratio between inertial and viscous forces — the Reynolds number. When this number reaches a critical value, the motion changes suddenly from smooth and orderly flow to become irregular and unpredictable.
The Reynolds number occurs in diverse problems: fish swimming in the sea, burning gas in a jet turbine, blood being pumped through our arteries, dispersal of pollutants in the atmosphere and hurricanes threatening the coastline. It is thanks to this number that we can design wind farms and aircraft using small-scale models, confident that our predictions will be valid at full scale.
The Reynolds number is also proving valuable in non-traditional fields. The flow of money through an economic system is modelled by equations with velocity representing the speed of cash flow and transaction costs acting like viscosity.
Information in computer networks can also be simulated in this way, with velocity related to bandwidth and viscosity arising from limitations of processing speed. In both cases, a ratio analogous to the Reynolds number allows us to characterise different regimes of behaviour and predict transitions between them.
Peter Lynch is emeritus professor at the school of mathematics and statistics at University College Dublin — he blogs at thatsmaths.com