A protest move by Kilkenny and Dublin senior camogie teams at the Leinster senior semi-final, whereby the players wore shorts instead of the regulatory ‘skorts’, almost saw the match being completely called off.
The 30 women, 15 from Kilkenny wearing black shorts and 15 from Dublin kitted out in navy shorts, may still face sanctions after they stood determinedly on the pitch at St Peregrine’s GAA club, Blanchardstown, as the national anthem started at the throw-in time of 3.30pm on Saturday.
The move was part of a campaign to allow women the choice to wear shorts instead of the obligatory skorts, which are skirts with shorts underneath.
Referee Ray Kelly from Kildare told the teams, with Kilkenny managed by Tommy Shefflin and Dublin by Gerry McQuaid, that they would have to get changed into skorts or the match would be abandoned.
[ Skorts: What are they and why are we suddenly talking about them?Opens in new window ]
As Amhrán na bhFiann was being played , the Dublin team walked off while the Kilkenny side stayed standing shoulder to shoulder until they too left the pitch after the anthem finished.
Confusion reigned, with hundreds of onlookers wondering what was happening, as many had not noticed the women wearing shorts.
Several minutes later, the Kilkenny team came back on to the pitch wearing their skorts while the Dublin side seemed to be making their minds up as to what they would do.
About five minutes later the Dubs came out of the changing rooms, now wearing the mandatory skorts. Eventually it was game on.
Aoife Lanigan, Kilkenny press officer, said she believed that the plucky move by the players will certainly make GAA management take note. But there could still be sanctions to face.
“They could face big fines and the players having their names written in a match report by the referee. The players were making a point for all to see [within the Camogie Association]. When all three associations combine, the question will surely be why do women have to continue wearing skorts?”
[ Camogie Association ‘committed’ to players after proposals to allow shorts failOpens in new window ]
Many camogie players find the mandated skirt-short hybrids restricting, but it seems they will be stuck wearing them until 2027 at least. The Camogie Association, the GAA and the LGFA previously revealed that 2027 was the proposed date for their plans for full integration between the three.
Camogie players are obliged to wear skorts under rule 6(b) of the sport’s code, which stipulates that playing gear must include a skirt/skort/divided skirt. The issue is that most players hate wearing them, arguing that they restrict their freedom, largely because the shorts are of the “compression” kind, and they would prefer to wear regular shorts.
Secondary-school Kilkenny supporter Tara Kelly said the women “should be allowed to have a choice of what they wear whether it is skort or short. It should be about comfort, not having to be kitted out in one or the other.”
Numerous other female supporters agreed, with one teenager who did not wish to be named adding: “I think the shorts look good and the women certainly look much more comfortable”. A number of men did not even notice that the players were wearing shorts instead of skorts at the start of the game.
Kilkenny ultimately picked up a 4-11 to 2-12 victory over Dublin.
A Gaelic Player Association (GPA) spokesperson said: “The GPA fully supports players having the right to choose between shorts or skorts and our position on this will not change.
“It is unacceptable that female athletes are being compelled to wear gear that they believe compromises their performance and well-being. We stand firmly with any player or team who opts for shorts and commend the Dublin and Kilkenny players for asserting that right today.
“These athletes were put in an impossible position — wear what they believe is right or face the prospect of the game being abandoned. As always, players chose to compete.
“We now call on the Camogie Association to listen to players and respect their autonomy”.
Last year, London club Thomas McCurtains launched its Shorts Not Skorts campaign, and it all came to a head last weekend when two proposals were put to camogie’s congress calling for the rule to be changed.
Both proposals were defeated. And the issue cannot come up for discussion again until 2027.
More than 60 per cent of the delegates voted against Tipperary and Kerry’s motion calling for the skirt/skort/divided skirt wording to be removed completely and replaced with “shorts”, while 55 per cent said no to Meath and Britain’s proposal that shorts be offered as a choice alongside skorts.
