Soccer

Manchester United board to vote on Jim Ratcliffe’s bid for 25 per cent share of club

Ineos owner confident bid will be accepted after Sheikh Jassim bin Hamad al-Thani pulled out of the reckoning

Sir Jim Ratcliffe has bid for a 25 per cent share of Manchester United. Photograph: Peter Byrne/PA Wire
Sir Jim Ratcliffe has bid for a 25 per cent share of Manchester United. Photograph: Peter Byrne/PA Wire
Jamie Jackson
Sun Oct 15 2023 - 16:36

Manchester United’s board is expected to vote on Jim Ratcliffe’s bid to buy a 25 per cent share in the club for circa €1.5bn in the coming days, with sources close to the Ineos owner confident his offer will be accepted.

Ratcliffe’s offer values the whole club at €7.15bn, while United is valued at around €3.03bn. It is thought that Ratcliffe, who is one of Britain’s richest people, may have offered a premium price for his potential holding in exchange to gain sporting control of the club. If so, this would throw the future of the team and United’s football operations into doubt. Erik ten Hag is the manager and John Murtough, the football director.

The six Glazer siblings are majority shareholders and are set to vote on Ratcliffe’s bid – if accepted, it would subsequently be formally ratified.

Ratcliffe is now the only publicly declared bidder after Sheikh Jassim bin Hamad al-Thani informed United’s owners, the Glazers, that he had withdrawn his 100 per cent offer of €5.77bn-plus for the club.

READ MORE

The decision came after further recent discussions in which the Glazers made clear their asking price – thought to be €7.38bn – and Sheikh Jassim pulled out due to what sources close to him described as “a fanciful and outlandish valuation”. He had also pledged a further €1.6bn to finance transfers, plans for a new stadium and training facilities, plus city and community regeneration projects and, separately, to clear the near €1.15bn club debt.

Ratcliffe’s closing in on buying a 25 per cent stake comes 11 months after the Glazers began the process. On 22 November last year, they stated they were “commencing a process to explore strategic alternatives” in a move that signalled their proprietorship, which began in 2005, could end. The club said the process would consider a number of options “including new investment into the club, a sale, or other transactions involving the company”. – Guardian