Hillsborough families decry ‘bitter injustice’ that no officers will face disciplinary proceedings

None of the former officers named by the IOPC will face disciplinary proceedings because they have all retired

Charlotte Hennessy (left), the daughter of 29-year-old Jimmy Hennessy, and Margaret Aspinall, the mother of 18-year-old James Aspinall, during a press conference at the offices of law firm Broudie Jackson Canter in Liverpool following the release of the IOPC report into the actions of the police during and after the 1989 Hillsborough stadium disaster. Photograph: Peter Byrne/PA Wire
Charlotte Hennessy (left), the daughter of 29-year-old Jimmy Hennessy, and Margaret Aspinall, the mother of 18-year-old James Aspinall, during a press conference at the offices of law firm Broudie Jackson Canter in Liverpool following the release of the IOPC report into the actions of the police during and after the 1989 Hillsborough stadium disaster. Photograph: Peter Byrne/PA Wire

The families of those who died in the 1989 Hillsborough disaster have said it is a “bitter injustice” that no police officer will ever be held accountable for a catalogue of failings set out in the final report of the police watchdog after a 14-year investigation.

The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) found that 12 police officers, most of them senior, would have faced disciplinary cases of gross misconduct if they were still serving.

However, no former officer will face disciplinary proceedings because they have all retired. Some, including Peter Wright, the chief constable of South Yorkshire police at the time of the disaster, have died.

Steve Kelly, whose brother Mike, 38, died at Hillsborough, said: “No one should be beaten by the passage of time. We should have truth, justice and accountability, at least within a person’s lifetime.”

Margaret Aspinall, whose son James, 18, was one of the 97 people killed at Hillsborough, said in response: “How lucky are they [the police officers] to have died in their own home, not traumatised like we all were. The youngest who died at Hillsborough was 10, how lucky are they to grow old. I’m so angry with their response.”

Ten of the men whom the IOPC said would have faced gross misconduct cases were in the South Yorkshire force, including senior officers responsible for safety at Hillsborough. The IOPC listed six gross misconduct allegations against Wright, including for seeking to minimise the force’s responsibility and deflect blame on to the victims, Liverpool Football Club supporters.

Two other men were senior officers in West Midlands police, which was appointed to investigate the South Yorkshire force after the disaster. Mervyn Jones and Michael Foster would have faced allegations that they “failed to investigate effectively” and were “biased against supporters in favour of South Yorkshire police”.

In a statement, the South Yorkshire Police Federation criticised the IOPC report as “not fair or balanced” and said: “Former police officers – some of whom are very elderly and some who have sadly passed away – do not have any kind of due process or the ability to formally respond to the allegations made in this report.”

The 366-page report, delivered to bereaved families in recent days, marks the culmination of 14 years’ work by the IOPC, which describes it as “the largest independent investigation into alleged police misconduct and criminality ever carried out in England and Wales”.

The investigation, based in Warrington, began in 2012 after the Hillsborough Independent Panel had made landmark findings on police culpability, which led to the quashing of the verdict of accidental death from the first inquest in 1991.

Anfield's Hillsborough memorial remembers the 97 killed during the FA Cup semi-final against Nottingham Forest in 1989. Photograph: Peter Byrne/PA Wire
Anfield's Hillsborough memorial remembers the 97 killed during the FA Cup semi-final against Nottingham Forest in 1989. Photograph: Peter Byrne/PA Wire

The IOPC said in the report that it had found 110 complaints upheld or cases to answer against former officers, including for “falsehood and prevarication”, “discreditable conduct”, “abuse of authority” and “neglect of duty”.

Some people whose relatives died at Hillsborough said they welcomed the findings, but were outraged that the IOPC did not find more cases to answer against South Yorkshire police officers for falsely blaming Liverpool supporters.

The IOPC has explained its view that in the absence of a duty of candour to positively assist an investigation, in 1989 the South Yorkshire force and its officers were not breaking the law or conduct rules by “presenting their best case” about the causes of the disaster, even though it involved withholding crucial information and amending hundreds of officers’ statements.

There has also been disappointment among survivors that the IOPC has not criticised the West Midlands police investigation more extensively. The watchdog did uphold some complaints, but said it had not found West Midlands officers were generally intimidating towards the survivors they interviewed, asked them excessively about supporters drinking, or were biased towards South Yorkshire police.

Ninety-seven men, women and children were killed as a result of the crush at the FA Cup semi-final between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest at Sheffield Wednesday’s Hillsborough stadium on April 15th, 1989.

The jury at the second inquests into the disaster found in April 2016 a series of failings by South Yorkshire police, and that the victims were unlawfully killed owing to gross negligence manslaughter by the officer in command, Ch Supt David Duckenfield. The jury also determined that no behaviour by Liverpool supporters contributed to the disaster.

Duckenfield was then acquitted in a criminal prosecution in 2019. No police officer has been convicted of any criminal offences in relation to the Hillsborough failings, and none faced disciplinary proceedings at the time they were serving.

After Operation Resolve, an investigation overseen by the IOPC into how the disaster happened, the watchdog has found Duckenfield would have faced 10 gross misconduct cases, including for his notorious lie that Liverpool supporters had forced open an exit gate to gain entry to the stadium. In fact Duckenfield had ordered the wide gate to be opened, to relieve serious congestion outside the ground.

Supt Roger Marshall and Supt Bernard Murray, who had senior crowd safety roles, would also have faced gross misconduct cases, the IOPC said, as would the then South Yorkshire police assistant chief constable Walter Jackson. He was off duty but on call, and was at the match; the allegation against him was that: “ACC Jackson failed to organise and direct junior-ranking police officers to help save lives ... ACC Jackson failed to take control of the disaster.”

Sir Norman Bettison, who was a chief inspector at South Yorkshire police and later became chief constable of Merseyside police, would have faced allegations that he “provided misleading and inaccurate press statements” which minimised his role at South Yorkshire police after the disaster, and was “deliberately dishonest about his involvement in the disaster” when he applied for the Merseyside position. The Liverpool MP Ian Byrne has written to the Cabinet Office calling for Bettison to be stripped of his knighthood.

Norman Bettison was a chief inspector at South Yorkshire police at the time of the Hillsborough disaster. Photograph: Christopher Furlong/Getty Images
Norman Bettison was a chief inspector at South Yorkshire police at the time of the Hillsborough disaster. Photograph: Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

A mounted police officer, PC David Scott, would have faced the allegation that he lied when he said that his horse had been burned by Liverpool supporters.

Bereaved families have campaigned since 2017 for a “Hillsborough law”, which was finally introduced into parliament by Keir Starmer’s government in September, aimed at deterring official cover-ups by introducing a duty of “candour, transparency and frankness” for police officers and public officials.

Aspinall said: “I cannot accept or understand how 97 people can be unlawfully killed, the police can lie, and nobody is held accountable. I recognise that the IOPC and Operation Resolve have worked hard and some of these findings are strong. But it’s absolutely ridiculous that so few people have been accused of gross misconduct for the lies and cover-up we’ve had to fight for 36 years.”

Nicola Brook, a solicitor at Broudie Jackson Canter acting for several bereaved families, said: “Yes, the law has now changed so this loophole cannot be used in future. But for those affected by this case, that is no consolation. They are left with yet another bitter injustice: the truth finally acknowledged, but accountability denied.”

The IOPC deputy director general Kathie Cashell said she sympathised with families who still felt they had not received proper explanations or justice, describing it as “deeply unsatisfactory” to be “still looking for those answers” 36 years on.

“There was absolutely a defensive approach by South Yorkshire police, there were allegations made about fan behaviour that have been repeatedly disproven. But there is a difference between that as a fact, and then finding individuals culpable for gross misconduct or misconduct,” she said.

“In order to meet the evidential threshold, it is a high bar to prove not just that [a statement] was a falsehood but that it was knowingly put forward as a falsehood.”

The IOPC made clear that it supports the Hillsborough law, saying in the report: “If such a duty had existed in 1989, it may have helped bring the full facts of what occurred to light far sooner.” – Guardian

  • Join The Irish Times on WhatsApp and stay up to date

  • What’s making headlines in the rugby world? Listen to The Counter Ruck podcast with Nathan Johns

  • Sign up for push alerts to get the best breaking news, analysis and comment delivered to your phone