A Pakistani court has barred officers from arresting the former prime minister Imran Khan until the end of the month, according to officials, after police filed terrorism charges against him.
The court protected Mr Khan, the leader of Pakistan’s opposition, from arrest until September 1st over accusations that during a speech at the weekend he threatened police officers and a judge.
Events before the court’s decision had raised fears of violent clashes between police and Mr Khan, who is leading mass rallies and seeking snap elections after being ousted.
The government says elections will be held as scheduled next year.
Markets in Vienna or Christmas at The Shelbourne? 10 holiday escapes over the festive season
Ciara Mageean: ‘I just felt numb. It wasn’t even sadness, it was just emptiness’
Stealth sackings: why do employers fire staff for minor misdemeanours?
Carl and Gerty Cori: a Nobel Prizewinning husband and wife team
On Thursday, Mr Khan told reporters outside the court that he never threatened anyone. He said the terrorism charges against him were politically motivated and that Shehbaz Sharif’s government feared his growing popularity.
“You are making fun of Pakistan,” Mr Khan said of Mr Sharif’s government.
Later, Mr Khan went to another court where a criminal case was registered against him this week on charges of defying a ban on staging rallies in the capital, Islamabad. He was protected from arrest in that case as well until September 7th.
Earlier, in the alleged terrorism case, Khan’s lawyer, Babar Awan, requested the court grant bail to Mr Khan. Mr Awan said the charges filed against Mr Khan were “an act of revenge”.
Arriving at court, Mr Khan was asked to walk toward the courtroom as ordinary suspects do. The court agreed to extend Mr Khan’s protection from arrest until September 1st.
Hundreds of Mr Khan’s supporters gathered outside the court building, chanting slogans against Sharif’s government. Protesters said Mr Khan was being politically victimised by Mr Sharif’s government. Later, Mr Khan left the court for his home on the outskirts of Islamabad.
Mr Sharif replaced Mr Khan in April when the former cricket star turned Islamist politician was ousted in a no-confidence vote in parliament. Legal experts say Khan could face from several months to 14 years in prison, the equivalent of a life sentence, if he is found guilty of the terrorism charges in the trial, which has not started yet.
Thursday’s appearance by Mr Khan before the anti-terrorism tribunal amid tight security was the latest development in the saga between Pakistan’s government and the former prime minister, who has been holding mass rallies as he seeks to return to power.
Mr Khan is also due to appear before the Islamabad high court on August 31st to face contempt proceedings on charges of threatening a judge. A conviction in this case would disqualify him from politics for life under Pakistani law, as no convicted person can run for office.
It is the second time Mr Khan has faced contempt charges. After elections in 1993 he was summoned but pardoned by the supreme court after describing the conduct of the judiciary as “shameful” and saying it did not ensure free and fair elections.
Legal experts say Mr Khan has limited options and could avoid a conviction if he apologises for his remarks against Judge Zeba Chaudhry, after he told her to “get ready for it, we will also take action against you”.
Since his ousting as prime minister, Mr Khan has alleged – without providing evidence – that Pakistan’s powerful military took part in a US plot to unseat him. Washington, the Pakistani military and the government of Mr Sharif have all denied the allegation.
Mr Khan came to power promising to break the pattern of family rule in Pakistan. His opponents contend he was elected with help from the powerful military, which has ruled the country for half of its 75-year history. Since his removal from power Mr Khan has demanded early elections and vowed to oust Sharif’s government through “pressure from the people”.
Nusrat Javed, a political analyst and author, said the military supported Mr Khan as an alternative to dynastic politics and to break the cycle of power sharing.
“Khan is a true populist and charismatic personality and his narrative, ‘us vs them’, made him the military’s man to back him against the Sharifs and Bhuttos,” said Javed, referring to families who have long dominated the country’s politics. – (Guardian)