Rishi Sunak and Boris Johnson have engaged in an extraordinary war of words over the former British prime minister’s failed attempts to elevate several close allies to the House of Lords.
Mr Sunak accused his predecessor on Monday morning of having lobbied him to overturn due process and appoint three Conservative MPs to the House of Lords – claims Mr Johnson dismissed publicly as “rubbish”.
The exchanges brought into the open the long-running dispute between the two men, which has caused a wider rift in the Conservative party and triggered a series of byelections that could test Mr Sunak’s grip on power.
The public row began on Monday morning, three days after Downing Street published Mr Johnson’s resignation honours list without the names of three MPs whom the former prime minister wanted to make peers – Nadine Dorries, Nigel Adams and Alok Sharma.
Donald Trump’s return adds urgency and uncertainty to third winter of full Russia-Ukraine war
Matt Gaetz perched on the tightrope between political glory and infamy
Vote on assisted dying Bill due to be a cliffhanger as Britain’s Labour opposition mounts
China may be better prepared for Trump this time
Asked about the controversy during a speech at London Tech Week, Mr Sunak defended the decision not to include those names, given that the House of Lords Appointments Commission (Holac) recommends that any MP recommended for a peerage should stand down to take up the new position within six months.
“Boris Johnson asked me to do something that I wasn’t prepared to do, because I didn’t think it was right. That was either overrule the Holac committee, or make promises to people,” he said. “Now, I wasn’t prepared to do that, so I didn’t think he was right. And if people don’t like that then tough.”
Mr Johnson hit back within hours, issuing a statement saying: “Rishi Sunak is talking rubbish. To honour these peerages it was not necessary to overrule Holac – but simply to ask them to renew their vetting, which was a mere formality.”
Mr Johnson’s allies have never forgiven Mr Sunak for his decision to stand down as chancellor last year, a move that helped bring down Mr Johnson as prime minister.
Tensions were renewed over recent weeks over both Mr Johnson’s honours list and the decision by the Cabinet Office to withhold some of the former prime minister’s communications from the Covid-19 inquiry.
Mr Johnson unexpectedly announced on Friday he would resign as an MP immediately after learning that the House of Commons privileges committee was set to recommend he be suspended for at least 10 days for lying to the house about Covid breaches during parties at Downing Street.
Ms Dorries and Mr Adams also resigned, setting up three difficult byelections for the Conservatives within the next few months.
Ms Dorries said on Monday she believed Downing Street had “withheld information”, leading her to believe incorrectly that she would be given a peerage.
Mr Sunak’s official spokesperson said on Monday it was “entirely untrue” that the prime minister or his No 10 team removed names from Mr Johnson’s peerages list.
Downing Street received the final list from Holac, which confirmed at the weekend it had rejected eight of the proposed peerages, in February. Since then, the government has been waiting for the Cabinet Office to finish vetting names put forward for other honours.
Initially, the delay was attributed to the large number of honours Johnson wanted to bestow on his close friends and confidants, reportedly including a knighthood for his father, Stanley.
Downing Street also defended the work of MPs on the privileges committee, which has been the focus of attacks by Mr Johnson and his allies. - Guardian Service