Diplomat quits as UK ‘may be complicit in war crimes’ over Israel arms sales

Mark Smith wrote in resignation letter that members of the Israeli government had expressed ‘open genocidal intent’

Displaced Palestinians watch from a makeshift camp as shells fired from Israeli tanks hit an area near the Hamad residential complex in Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip. Photograph: Bashar Taleb/AFP via Getty Images
Displaced Palestinians watch from a makeshift camp as shells fired from Israeli tanks hit an area near the Hamad residential complex in Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip. Photograph: Bashar Taleb/AFP via Getty Images

A British diplomat has resigned from the UK foreign office as he believes the department “may be complicit in war crimes” for continuing to allow arms sales to Israel.

Mark Smith, listed as a second secretary in the British embassy in Ireland, wrote in a resignation letter to colleagues, later posted online, that members of the Israeli government and military had expressed “open genocidal intent”.

Mr Smith also said it was “deeply troubling” that the department had “disregarded” his concerns on the illegality of continued arms sales.

In the letter, he wrote: “It is with sadness that I resign after a long career in the diplomatic service, however I can no longer carry out my duties in the knowledge that this department may be complicit in war crimes.”

READ MORE

Mr Smith said he was a former penholder on the arms export licensing assessment in the Middle East and North African department, experience he said made him a “subject matter expert” on arms sales policy.

“Each day we witness clear and unquestionable examples of war crimes and breaches of international humanitarian law in Gaza perpetuated by the state of Israel,” he said.

“Senior members of the Israeli government and military have expressed open genocidal intent, Israeli soldiers take videos deliberately burning, destroying and looting civilian property, and openly admit to the rape and torture of prisoners.

“There is no justification for the UK’s continued arms sales to Israel and yet somehow it continues. I have raised this at every level in the organisation including through an official whistle-blowing investigation and received nothing more than ‘thank you, we have noted your concern’,” he said.

“Ministers claim the UK has one of the most ‘robust and transparent’ arms export licensing regimes in the world, however this is the opposite of the truth.”

He concluded the letter: “I hope that we can look back on history and be proud.”

While in opposition the now foreign secretary David Lammy urged the foreign office (FCDO) to publish its formal legal advice as to whether Israel was complying with international humanitarian law.

When contacted by The Irish Times, the British embassy in Dublin directed queries to the UK foreign office. A foreign office spokesperson said: “This government is committed to upholding international law. We have made clear that we will not export items if they might be used to commit or facilitate a serious violation of international humanitarian law.

“There is an ongoing review process to assess whether Israel is complying with international humanitarian law, which the foreign secretary initiated on day one in office. We will provide an update as soon as that review process has been completed.”

Since 2008 the UK has licensed arms worth more than £576 million (€677 million) to Israel, according to analysis of government export data by the Campaign Against Arms Trade. - PA