Republican Kevin McCarthy insisted he has the votes to be elected speaker of the House of Representatives, after convincing a large number of party rebels to support his bid to lead the lower chamber of Congress.
By Friday afternoon, McCarthy had lost a historic 13 ballots, spread over four days, in his effort to be selected as Speaker.
But as the House voted to adjourn until late Friday night, Mr McCarthy told reporters on Capitol Hill: “I’ll have the votes.” When asked why he was confident, the congressman from California replied: “Because I count.”
Mr McCarthy struck the bullish tone after making several rounds of concessions to his critics, including rule changes that would make it easier to call for a vote of no confidence in a future speaker, and promises of plum committee assignments for members of the ultra-conservative House Freedom Caucus.
Those efforts swayed more than half of the 20 Republicans who had opposed his speakership in previous rounds, including Dan Bishop of North Carolina and Byron Donalds of Florida. But by the 13th round of voting on Friday, Mr McCarthy was still short of the simple majority required to seize the speaker’s gavel.
One previous holdout who flipped to support Mr McCarthy in the 12th vote, Scott Perry of Pennsylvania, tweeted after the ballot: “We’re at a turning point. I’ve negotiated in good faith, with one purpose: to restore the People’s House back to its rightful owners. The framework for an agreement is in place, so in a good-faith effort, I voted to restore the People’s House by voting for McCarthy.”
But resistance from six members of his own party remained steadfast and defiant – enough to scupper his chances of winning the gavel in the House in the first round of voting on Friday.
Bob Good, a Virginia Republican who has been among the dissidents, told the Financial Times on Friday morning that he would not support Mr McCarthy “at any time”.
“The whole reality is he does not have 218, he’s not going to have 218, and the sooner that he surrenders to that reality, the sooner we can move forward as a conference and begin to debate, vet and assess ... [alternative] candidates,” he said.
Mr Good said he would like to see Jim Jordan, the Ohio Republican, as speaker, but suggested that other members should propose Steve Scalise, the Louisiana Republican and a member of the House Republican leadership, as a possible candidate. “There are members who are in support of him, I think they should put his name forward, nominate him, and vote for him.”
Even though Mr McCarthy had made big concessions in recent days, there remained a significant lack of “trust” in his willingness to follow through with them, Mr Good said.
“He doesn’t believe in any of the things he’s agreeing to do so he would be doing them only under compulsion because he’s desperate,” Mr Good said.
The last time it took more than one round of voting to select a Speaker was 1923, when it took nine ballots. The House is constitutionally required to select a speaker, and cannot move on to any legislative business until someone is handed the gavel.
The Republican infighting has exposed long-simmering tensions in a party that is grappling with how to move forward after a relatively disappointing performance in November’s midterm elections.
Mr McCarthy finds himself in a difficult position in part because the “red wave” he and others predicted did not materialise, and Republicans now control the House by a razor-thin margin.
The gridlock in the House has also raised questions about how Congress will function for the next two years, and whether Mr McCarthy or any other speaker will be able to wrangle the party’s warring factions to pass any legislation.
One looming threat is the possibility of a debt ceiling crisis later this year. Economists have forecast that the US economy risks default in the third quarter if lawmakers do not agree to raise the limit on government borrowing.
– Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2023