Appeals court upholds E Jean Carroll’s $83m defamation judgment against Donald Trump

Court rejects Trump’s argument that he deserves presidential immunity

E Jean Carroll's separate $5 million jury verdict against Donald Trump was upheld in June. Photograph: John Minchillo/AP
E Jean Carroll's separate $5 million jury verdict against Donald Trump was upheld in June. Photograph: John Minchillo/AP

A federal appeals court on Monday refused to throw out an $83.3 million jury verdict against US president Donald Trump for damaging the reputation of the writer E Jean Carroll in 2019 when he denied her rape claim. The 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan rejected Mr Trump’s argument that the January 2024 verdict should be overturned because he deserved presidential immunity from Ms Carroll’s lawsuit.

“The jury’s duly rendered damages awards were reasonable in light of the extraordinary and egregious facts of this case,” a three-judge panel wrote in a unanimous opinion.

Neither the White House nor Mr Trump’s personal lawyers in the case immediately responded to requests for comment. The 2nd Circuit on June 13th upheld Ms Carroll’s separate $5 million jury verdict against Mr Trump in May 2023 for a similar defamation and for sexual assault.

Ms Carroll (81) a former Elle magazine columnist, accused Mr Trump of attacking her around 1996 in a Bergdorf Goodman department store dressingroom.

Mr Trump first denied her claim in June 2019, telling a reporter that Ms Carroll was “not my type” and had concocted the story to sell her memoir What Do We Need Men For?

He essentially repeated his comments in an October 2022 Truth Social post, leading to the $5 million verdict, though the jury did not find that Mr Trump had raped Ms Carroll.

The $83.3 million award comprised $18.3 million of damages for emotional and reputational harm, and $65 million of punitive damages. In his latest appeal, Mr Trump argued that the US Supreme Court’s July 2024 decision providing him with substantial criminal immunity shielded him from liability in Ms Carroll’s civil case.

He also said he had spoken about Ms Carroll in 2019 in his capacity as president, and that failing to give him immunity could undermine the independence of the Executive Branch.

Epstein victims call on US Congress to pass Bill forcing the release of documentsOpens in new window ]

Mr Trump also said US district judge Lewis Kaplan, who oversaw both trials, had made other mistakes, including by striking out his testimony that, in speaking about Ms Carroll, “I just wanted to defend myself, my family, and frankly the presidency”.

In June, Ms Carroll released another memoir, Not My Type: One Woman vs a President, about her legal battles against Mr Trump. – Reuters

  • Join The Irish Times on WhatsApp and stay up to date

  • Sign up for push alerts to get the best breaking news, analysis and comment delivered directly to your phone

  • Listen to In The News podcast daily for a deep dive on the stories that matter